<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mrj</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Современная ревматология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Modern Rheumatology Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1996-7012</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2310-158X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IMA-PRESS, LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14412/1996-7012-2022-6-32-37</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mrj-1369</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Удержание на терапии тофацитинибом пациентов с ревматоидным артритом (данные реальной клинической практики)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Retention on tofacitinib therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (real clinical practice data)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0928-3911</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гриднева</surname><given-names>Г. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gridneva</surname><given-names>G. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Гриднева Галина Игоревна.</p><p>115522, Москва, Каширское шоссе, 34А</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Galina I. Gridneva.</p><p>34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">gigridneva@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-5357</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Аронова</surname><given-names>Е. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Aronova</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>115522, Москва, Каширское шоссе, 34А</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-2054</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Белов</surname><given-names>Б. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Belov</surname><given-names>B. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>115522, Москва, Каширское шоссе, 34А</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Научно-исследовательский институт ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>32</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гриднева Г.И., Аронова Е.С., Белов Б.С., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гриднева Г.И., Аронова Е.С., Белов Б.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gridneva G.I., Aronova E.S., Belov B.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/1369">https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/1369</self-uri><abstract><p>Оценка причин отмены терапии ингибиторами Янус-киназ (uJAK) может дать ключ к более эффективному их применению.</p><p>Цель исследования — анализ выживаемости терапии тофацитинибом (ТОФА) и причин его отмены при ревматоидном артрите (РА) в реальной клинической практике.</p><sec><title>Пациенты и методы</title><p>Пациенты и методы. В исследование включено 30 взрослых пациентов с РА, госпитализированных в ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой» с 2018 по 2020 г. для назначения генно-инженерных биологических препаратов (ГИБП), а также и./AK. Пациенты оставались под наблюдением в течение 3 лет или до момента прекращения лечения ТОФА, в зависимости от того, какое событие наступало раньше.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты и обсуждение</title><p>Результаты и обсуждение. В качестве первой линии терапии ТОФА был назначен 3 пациентам. У всех этих пациентов препарат был отменен по следующим причинам: недостаточная эффективность (НЭ) после 2 полных лет лечения; нежелательная реакция (НР); административные причины (АП), т. е. невозможность продолжать терапию в связи с отсутствием обеспечения препаратом по месту жительства. В качестве второй линии терапии ТОФА получали 11 больных, у 8 из них лечение было прервано: у 4 — из-за НЭ, у 3 — из-за НР (кожная аллергия) и у 1 — по АП через год после его начала. В качестве третьей линии терапии ТОФА был назначен 9 больным, у 2 из них препарат был отменен в связи с НЭ и у 3 — в связи с НР (аллергический дерматит — у 2, диспепсия — у 1). Еще 1 пациентка отказалась от лечения из-за запланированной беременности. В качестве четвертой линии терапии ТОФА получали 6 больных, 5 из них (83,3%) продолжали его прием более 3 лет. У 1 пациентки ТОФА был отменен через 1 мес в связи с впервые появившимися сухим кашлем и одышкой. Еще у 1 больного, которому ТОФА был назначен в пятой линии терапии, лечение было прекращено из-за НР (рецидивирующий Herpes zoster).</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Как показали результаты исследования, связи между частотой возникновения НР или НЭ и клинико-демографическими показателями, а также частотой отмены ТОФА и линией терапии не выявлено. В то же время наименьшая длительность удержания на терапии ТОФА отмечена в случае его назначения в качестве препарата первой линии.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Evaluation of the reasons for discontinuation of therapy with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) may provide a clue to their more effective use.</p><sec><title>Objective</title><p>Objective : to analyze the survival of tofacitinib (TOFA) therapy and the reasons for its discontinuation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><title>Patients and methods</title><p>Patients and methods. The study included 30 adult patients with RA hospitalized to the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology from 2018 to 2020 for the biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or JAKi treatment. Patients were followed up for 3 years or until treatment with TOFA was discontinued, whichever occurred first.</p></sec><sec><title>Results and discussion</title><p>Results and discussion. TOFA was prescribed as the first line therapy in 3 patients. In all these patients, the drug was discontinued for the following reasons: insufficient efficacy (IE) after 2 full years of treatment; adverse reaction (AR); administrative reasons (AdR), i.e. the inability to continue therapy due to the lack of drug supply at the place of residence. 11 patients received TOFA as the second line therapy, in 8 of them the treatment was interrupted: in 4 due to IE, in 3 due to AR (skin allergy) and in 1 due to AdR one year after its initiation. TOFA was prescribed as a third line therapy in 9 patients, in 2 of them the drug was discontinued due to IE and in 3 due to AR (allergic dermatitis in 2, dyspepsia in 1). Another 1 patient refused treatment due to a planned pregnancy. 6 patients received TOFA as the fourth line therapy, 5 of them (83.3%) continued to receive it for more than 3 years. In 1 patient, TOFA was discontinued after 1 month due to the dry cough and shortness of breath onset. In another 1 patient who was prescribed TOFA as the fifth line therapy, treatment was discontinued due to AR (recurrent Herpes zoster).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. As the results of the study show, no relationship was found between the incidence of AR or IE and clinical and demographic indicators, as well as the frequency of TOFA withdrawal and the line of therapy. At the same time, the shortest duration of retention on TOFA therapy was noted when it was prescribed as a first-line drug.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>тофацитиниб</kwd><kwd>выживаемость терапии</kwd><kwd>удержание на терапии</kwd><kwd>ревматоидный артрит</kwd><kwd>причины отмены терапии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>tofacitinib</kwd><kwd>therapy survival</kwd><kwd>retention on therapy</kwd><kwd>rheumatoid arthritis</kwd><kwd>reasons for discontinuation of therapy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges JSL, et al. American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges JSL, et al. American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijlsma J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-77. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. Epub 2017 Mar 6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijlsma J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-77. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. Epub 2017 Mar 6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лила АМ, Древаль РО, Шипицын ВВ. Оценка организации медицинской помощи и лекарственного обеспечения при ревматических заболеваниях и социально-экономического бремени этих болезней в Российской Федерации. Современная ревматология. 2018;12(3):112-9. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2018-3-112-119</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lila AM, Dreval' RO, Shipitsyn VV. Assessment of organization of medical care and drug provision for patients with rheumatic diseases, and the socioeconomic burden of these diseases in the Russian Federation. Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2018;12(3):112-9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2018-3-112-119</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul;60(7):1895-905. doi: 10.1002/art.24567.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul;60(7):1895-905. doi: 10.1002/art.24567.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tanaka Y, Suzuki M, Nakamura H, et al. Phase II study of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) combined with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1150-8. doi: 10.1002/acr.20494.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanaka Y, Suzuki M, Nakamura H, et al. Phase II study of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) combined with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1150-8. doi: 10.1002/acr.20494.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, et al. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):617-29. doi: 10.1002/art.33383.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, et al. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):617-29. doi: 10.1002/art.33383.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kremer JM, Cohen S, Wilkinson BE, et al. A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):970-81. doi: 10.1002/art.33419. Epub 2011 Oct 17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kremer JM, Cohen S, Wilkinson BE, et al. A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):970-81. doi: 10.1002/art.33419. Epub 2011 Oct 17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):495-507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):495-507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoe-man C, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):451-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X. Epub 2013 Jan 5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoe-man C, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):451-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X. Epub 2013 Jan 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kremer J, Li ZG, Hall S, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4): 253-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4201308200-00006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kremer J, Li ZG, Hall S, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4): 253-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4201308200-00006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van der Heijde D, Tanaka Y, Fleischmann R, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: twelve-month data from a twenty-four-month phase III randomized radiographic study. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):559-70. doi: 10.1002/art.37816.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van der Heijde D, Tanaka Y, Fleischmann R, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: twelve-month data from a twenty-four-month phase III randomized radiographic study. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):559-70. doi: 10.1002/art.37816.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Hall S, et al. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2377-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310476</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Hall S, et al. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2377-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310476</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week, randomized, phase 2 study. Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;25(4): 514-21. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.995875.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week, randomized, phase 2 study. Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;25(4): 514-21. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.995875.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Hall S, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Jul 29; 390(10093):457-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31618-5. Epub 2017 Jun 16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Hall S, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Jul 29; 390(10093):457-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31618-5. Epub 2017 Jun 16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jan 28;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0932-2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jan 28;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0932-2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wollenhaupt J, Lee EB, Curtis JR, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for up to 9.5 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a global, open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Apr 5; 21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1866-2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wollenhaupt J, Lee EB, Curtis JR, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for up to 9.5 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a global, open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Apr 5; 21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1866-2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wollenhaupt J, Silverfield J, Lee EB, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in open-label, longterm extension studies.J Rheumatol. 2014 May;41(5): 837-52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130683. Epub 2014 Apr 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wollenhaupt J, Silverfield J, Lee EB, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in open-label, longterm extension studies.J Rheumatol. 2014 May;41(5): 837-52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130683. Epub 2014 Apr 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pope JE, Keystone E, Jamal S, et al. Persistence of tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in open-label, long-term extension studies up to 9.5 years. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2019 Mar 28;1(2):73-82. doi: 10.1002/acr2.1010. eCollection 2019 Apr.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pope JE, Keystone E, Jamal S, et al. Persistence of tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in open-label, long-term extension studies up to 9.5 years. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2019 Mar 28;1(2):73-82. doi: 10.1002/acr2.1010. eCollection 2019 Apr.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glintborg B, 0stergaard M, Krogh NS, et al. Clinical Response, Drug Survival and Predictors Thereof Among 548 Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Switched Tumor Necrosis Factor and Inhibitor Therapy. Results From Danish Nationwide Registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 May;65(5):1213-23. doi: 10.1002/art.37876.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glintborg B, 0stergaard M, Krogh NS, et al. Clinical Response, Drug Survival and Predictors Thereof Among 548 Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Switched Tumor Necrosis Factor and Inhibitor Therapy. Results From Danish Nationwide Registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 May;65(5):1213-23. doi: 10.1002/art.37876.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лыткина КА, Лукина ГВ, Кольцова ЕН и др. Выживаемость биологической терапии у пациентов с псориатическим артритом. Русский медицинский журнал. Медицинское обозрение. 2019;11(II):86-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lytkina KA, Lukina GV, Kol'tsova EN, et al. Survival of biological therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. Meditsinskoe obozrenie. 2019;11(II):86-9. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kragstrup TW, Glintborg B, Svensson AL, et al. Waiting for JAK inhibitor safety data. RMD Open. 2022 Feb;8(1):e002236. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002236.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kragstrup TW, Glintborg B, Svensson AL, et al. Waiting for JAK inhibitor safety data. RMD Open. 2022 Feb;8(1):e002236. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002236.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аронова ЕС, Лукина ГВ, Глухова СИ и др. Выживаемость при генно-инженерной биологической терапии у бионаивных больных ревматоидным артритом: данные ретроспективного 12-месячного наблюдения. Терапевтический архив. 2020;92(5): 39-45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aronova ES, Lukina GV, Glukhova SI, et al. Survival in genetically engineered biological therapy in bio-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from a retrospective 12-month follow-up. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2020;92(5): 39-45. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Авдеева АС, Мисиюк АС, Сатыбалды-ев АМ и др. Анализ результатов терапии тофацитинибом в реальной клинической практике (по данным Общероссийского регистра больных артритом ОРЕЛ). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2020; 58(3):262-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avdeeva AS, Misiyuk AS, Satybaldyev AM, et al. Analysis of the results of therapy with to-facitinib in real clinical practice (according to the All-Russian Register of patients with arthritis EAGLE). Nauchno-prakticheskaya rev-matologiya. 2020;58(3):262-7. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bird P, Littlejohn G, Butche B, et al. Real-world evaluation of effectiveness, persistence, and usage patterns of tofacitinib in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Australia. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2545-51. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05021-7. Epub 2020 Mar 10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bird P, Littlejohn G, Butche B, et al. Real-world evaluation of effectiveness, persistence, and usage patterns of tofacitinib in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Australia. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2545-51. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05021-7. Epub 2020 Mar 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Finckh A, Tellenbach C, Herzog L, et al; physicians and patients of the SCQM. Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland. RMD Open.2020 May; 6(1):e001174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001174.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Finckh A, Tellenbach C, Herzog L, et al; physicians and patients of the SCQM. Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland. RMD Open.2020 May; 6(1):e001174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001174.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ebina K, Hirano T, Maeda Y, et al. Factors affecting drug retention of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7; 12(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04075-0.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ebina K, Hirano T, Maeda Y, et al. Factors affecting drug retention of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7; 12(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04075-0.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
