Preview

Modern Rheumatology Journal

Advanced search

The place of febuxostat in the treatment of gout

https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-3-150-155

Abstract

The curation of patients with gout involves the mandatory prescription of pathogenetic therapy with urate-lowering drugs, among which xanthine oxidase inhibitors, such as allopurinol and febuxostat, are most widely used. According to various national and international guidelines, allopurinol is the first line drug for gout. However, there is a large cohort of patients, in whom the use of febuxostat is not only justified, but is also preferable. First of all, these are patients who are intolerant to allopurinol and at a high risk of severe skin reactions. There is a high risk of mortality and a low probability of achieving the target uric acid level when allopurinol is prescribed for patients with diminished renal function. Taking into account the fact that febuxostat has a pronounced nephroprotective effect, prescribing the drug in these patients will be a more effective way to achieve normouricemia. At the same time, the presence of cardiovascular diseases, although this requires additional caution when choosing therapy, should not be a reason for refusal to take febuxostat, since the results of many studies not only have failed to confirm a higher risk for cardiovascular events during therapy with this drug, but also have shown that it has cardioprotective properties.

About the Authors

A. M. Novikova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Aleksandra Mikhailovna Novikova

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



M. S. Eliseev
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522


References

1. Nasonova VA, Barskova VG. Early diagnostic and treatment of gout – is scientifically based reguirements for improvement of labour and living prognosis of patients. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2004;42(1):5-7. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-44842004-1374.

2. Nasonov EL, Eliseev MS. Role of interleukin 1 in the development of human diseases. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016; 54(1):60-77. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/19954484-2016-60-77.

3. Vladimirov SA, Eliseev MS, Il'inykh EV, et al. Gout. Clinical guidelines. http://cr.rosminzdrav.ru/#!/recomend/174

4. Ankli B, Krähenbü hl S. Gout management: an update. Ther Umsch. 2016;73(3): 115-24. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000766..

5. Murrell GA, Rapeport WG. Clinical pharmacokinetics of allopurinol. Clin Pharmacokinet. Sep-Oct 1986;11(5):343-53. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198611050-00001.

6. Food and Drug Adminitration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2009/021856s000toc.cfm

7. State register of medicinal products https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=d66743bb-2475-424f-81e11cce1985e88f&t=

8. Frampton JE. Febuxostat: a review of its use in the treatment of hyperuricaemia in patients with gout. Drugs. 2015 Mar;75(4): 427-38. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0360-7.

9. Kamel B, Graham GG, Williams KM, et al. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Febuxostat. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 May;56(5):459-75. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0466-4.

10. Wen C, Yee S, Liang X, et al. Genomewide association study identifies ABCG2 (BCRP) as an allopurinol transporter and a determinant of drug response. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 May;97(5):518-25. doi: 10.1002/cpt.89. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

11. Stamp LK, Topless R, Miner JN, et al. No association between ATP-binding cassette transporter G2 rs2231142 (Q141K) and uratelowering response to febuxostat. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 1;58(3): 547-48. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key423.

12. Miyata H, Takada T, Toyoda Y, et al. Identification of Febuxostat as a New Strong ABCG2 Inhibitor: Potential Applications and Risks in Clinical Situations. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 27;7:518. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00518. eCollection 2016.

13. Wright DF, Duffull SB, Merriman TR, et al. Predicting allopurinol response in patients with gout. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;81(2):277-89. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12799. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

14. Ryu HJ, Song R, Kim HW, et al. Clinical risk factors for adverse events in allopurinol users. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;53(2): 211-6. doi: 10.1177/0091270012439715.

15. Kim SC, Newcomb C, Margolis D, et al. Severe cutaneous reactions requiring hospitalization in allopurinol initiators: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Apr;65(4):578-84. doi: 10.1002/acr.21817.

16. Lu N, Rai SK, Terkeltaub R, et al. Racial disparities in the risk of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis as urate-lowering drug adverse events in the United States. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Oct;46(2):253-58. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

17. Yang CY, Chen CH, Deng ST, et al. Allopurinol use and risk of fatal hypersensitivity reactions: a nationwide populationbased study in Taiwan. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1550-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3536.

18. Hung SI, Chung WH, Liou LB, et al. HLA-B5801 allele as a genetic marker for severe cutaneous adverse reactions caused by allopurinol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 15;102(11):4134-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409500102. Epub 2005 Mar 2.

19. Bardin T, Chales G, Pascart T, et al. Risk of cutaneous adverse events with febuxostat treatment in patients with skin reaction to allopurinol. A retrospective, hospital-based study of 101 patients with consecutive allopurinol and febuxostat treatment. Joint Bone Spine. 2016 May;83(3):314-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

20. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):29-42. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707.

21. FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;72(6):744-60. doi: 10.1002/acr.24180.

22. Kim A, Kim Y, Kim GT, et al. Comparison of persistence rates between allopurinol and febuxostat as first-line uratelowering therapy in patients with gout: an 8-year retrospective cohort study. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05161-w. Online ahead of print.

23. Fan M, Liu J, Zhao B, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapies for hyperuricemic patients with gout: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05272-4. Online ahead of print.

24. Lertnawapan R, Jatuworapruk K. Efficacy of febuxostat versus allopurinol and the predictors of achieving target serum urate in a cohort of Thai people with gout. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05262-6. Online ahead of print.

25. Tsuruta Y, Mochizuki T, Moriyama T, et al. Switching from allopurinol to febuxostat for the treatment of hyperuricemia and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;33(11): 1643-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2745-5. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

26. Fuldeore MJ, Riedel AA, Zarotsky V, et al. Chronic kidney disease in goutin a managed care setting. BMC Nephrol. 2011 Aug 3;12:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-36.

27. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Comorbidities of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: NHANES 2007-8. Am J Med. 2012 Jul;125(7):679-687.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.033. Epub 2012 May 23.

28. Ng CY, Yeh YT, Wang CW, et al. Impact of the HLA-B(*)5801 Allele and Renal Impairment on Allopurinol-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Reactions. J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Jul;136(7):1373-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.02.808. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

29. Hira D, Chisaki Y, Noda S, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and therapeuticefficacy of febuxostat in patients with severe renal impairment. Pharmacology. 2015;96(1-2):90-8. doi: 10.1159/000434633. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

30. Juge PA, Truchetet ME, Pillebout E, et al. Efficacy and safety of febuxostat in 73 gouty patients with stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study of 10 centers. Joint Bone Spine. 2017 Oct;84(5):595-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

31. Lim DH, Oh JS, Ahn SM, et al. Febuxostat in Hyperuricemic Patients With Advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Nov;68(5):819-21. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

32. Liu X, Liu K, Sun Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of febuxostat for treating hyperuricemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Sep;16(3):1859-65. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6367. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

33. Shibagaki Y, Ohno I, Hosoya T, Kimura K. Safety, efficacy and renal effect of febuxostat in patients with moderate-to-severe kidney dysfunction. Hypertens Res. 2014 Oct;37(10): 919-25. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.107. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

34. Zeng XX, Tang Y, Hu K, et al. Efficacy of febuxostat in hyperuricemic patients with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: A PRISMA-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0161. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010161.

35. Yamanaka H, Tamaki S, Ide Y, et al. Stepwise dose increase of febuxostat is comparable with colchicine prophylaxis for the prevention of gout flares during the initial phase of urate-lowering therapy: results from FORTUNE-1, a prospective, multicentre randomised study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb; 77(2):270-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis2017-211574. Epub 2017 Nov 4.

36. Liu KL, Lee HF, Chou SH, et al. Acute gouty arthritis complicated with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction is independently associated with short- and long-term adverse non-fatal cardiac events. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;33(1):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067013-2376-2.

37. Keenan RT, O'Brien WR, Lee KH, et al. Prevalence of contraindications and prescription of pharmacologic therapies for gout. Am J Med. 2011 Feb;124(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.09.012.

38. Nyberg F, Horne L, Morlock R, et al. Comorbidity Burden in Trial-Aligned Patients with Established Gout in Germany, UK, US, and France: a Retrospective Analysis. Adv Ther. 2016 Jul;33(7):1180-98. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0346-1. Epub 2016 May 26.

39. Kanji T, Gandhi M, Clase CM, Yang R. Urate lowering therapy to improve renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2015 Apr 19;16:58. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0047-z.

40. Foody J, Turpin RS, Tidwell BA, et al. Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Gout and Associated Cardiovascular Disease or Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease Initiating a Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Nov;10(8):393-401.

41. Zhang M, Solomon DH, Desai RJ, et al. Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Older Patients With Gout Initiating Febuxostat Versus Allopurinol: Population-Based Cohort Study. Circulation. 2018 Sep 11;138(11):11161126. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033992.

42. Huang H, Huang B, Li Y, et al. Uric acid and risk of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;16(1):15-24. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft132. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

43. Cicero AFG, Cosentino ER, Kuwabara M, et al. Effects of allopurinol and febuxostat on cardiovascular mortality in elderly heart failure patients. Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Sep; 14(6):949-56. doi: 10.1007/s11739-01902070-y. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

44. White WB, Saag KG, Becker MA, et al. Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378(13):1200-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710895. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

45. Liu CW, Chang WC, Lee CC, et al. The net clinical benefits of febuxostat versus allopurinol in patients with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricemia – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Oct;29(10):1011-22. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

46. Kojima S, Matsui K, Hiramitsu S, et al. Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 7;40(22): 1778-86. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz119.

47. Ju C, Lai RW, Li KH, et al. Comparative cardiovascular risk in users versus non-users of xanthine oxidase inhibitors and febuxostat versus allopurinol users. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Sep 1;59(9):2340-49. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez576.

48. Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Barclay M, et al. The effect of kidney function on the urate lowering effect and safety of increasing allopurinol above doses based on creatinine clearance: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Dec 21;19(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1491-x.

49. Chikina MN, Eliseev MS, Zhelyabina OV. Practical application of national clinical guidelines for the management of gout (preliminary data). Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2020;14(2): 97-103. (In Russ.). doi:10.14412/1996-70122020-2-97-103.


Review

For citations:


Novikova AM, Eliseev MS. The place of febuxostat in the treatment of gout. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2020;14(3):150-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-3-150-155

Views: 879


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1996-7012 (Print)
ISSN 2310-158X (Online)