Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: results of an open single-center retrospective study
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2022-4-32-39
Abstract
Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIM) are rare diseases in which the prognosis is largely determined by timely diagnosis, timing of prescription and effectiveness of therapy.
Objective: to characterize the clinical phenotypes, the results of paraclinical examination methods, the spectrum of autoantibodies, as well as therapeutic options in patients with JIIM.
Patients and methods. The retrospective study included 37 patients with JIIM hospitalized in the pediatric department of the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology from 2016 to 2020. All patients underwent a standard clinical and laboratory-instrumental examination in accordance with the diagnosis and severity of the condition.
Results and discussion. Twenty-three of the 37 JIIM patients had juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), 1 had polymyositis, and 13 had overlap-myositis (OM). The ratio of boys and girls was 1:1.7. The median age of onset for JDM was 6.9 years, and OM was 11.3 years. All patients had skeletal muscles involvement, dysphagia was detected in 52.2% of cases of JDM and in 15.4% of cases of OM. An increase in the level of creatine phosphokinase at the time of diagnosis was observed in 72.9% of patients, of lactate dehydrogenase – in 81.1%, of alanine aminotransferase - in 67.6%, of aspartate aminotransferase – in 75.7%. Heliotrope rash and/or Gottron's syndrome were observed in 100% of patients with JDM and in 30.8% with OM. Lung involvement was found in 27% of children. The myopathic capillaroscopic changes were present in 95.2% of patients with JDM and 53.8% with OM. Myositis-specific autoantibodies were found in 10.8% of patients with JIIM.
All patients received glucocorticoids, 81.0% methotrexate, 18.9% hydroxychloroquine, 8.1% cyclophosphamide, 8.1% cyclosporine, 2.7% mycophenolate mofetil, 2.7% azathioprine, 67.6% - intravenous immunoglobulin. Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were prescribed to 26% of patients with JDM and to all patients with OM (only in 51.3% of cases with JIIM). The median duration of illness before initiation of bDMARDs therapy was 2.25 years. 58.8% of patients were treated with rituximab (RTM), 41.2% with abatacept (ABA). In 1 patient with OM, represented by a combination of systemic lupus erythematosus and JDM, three bDMARDs were used sequentially: ABA, etanercept and RTM. All patients achieved inactive disease status.
Conclusion. JDM is the most common phenotype of JIIM, which is characterized by an earlier age of onset, skin involvement that precedes the development of myopathy, and typical capillaroscopic changes. The conclusion was made about the high efficacy and acceptable safety profile of bDMARDs therapy in children with JIIM, with careful monitoring of its tolerability. bDMARDs can be prescribed even in the early stages of the disease in the presence of unfavorable prognostic factors.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. I. KaledaRussian Federation
Maria Igorevna Kaleda
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
I. P. Nikishina
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
S. O. Salugina
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
E. S. Fedorov
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
S. V. Arsenyeva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
A. N. Shapovalenko
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
T. N. Pachkoria
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
V. G. Matkava
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
References
1. Shah M, Mamyrova G, Targoff IN, et al; Childhood Myositis Heterogeneity Collaborative Study Group. The clinical phenotypes of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013 Jan;92(1): 25-41. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e31827f264d
2. Meyer A, Meyer N, Schaeffer M, et al. Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Jan;54(1):50-63. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu289
3. Mendez EP, Lipton R, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al; Registry Physician Referral Group. US incidence of juvenile dermatomyositis, 1995-1998: results from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jun 15; 49(3):300-5. doi: 10.1002/art.11122
4. Ravelli A, Trail L, Ferrari C, et al. Longterm outcome and prognostic factors of juvenile dermatomyositis: a multinational, multicenter study of 490 patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jan 15;62(1):63-72. doi: 10.1002/acr.20015
5. Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Feb 20;292(8):403-7
6. Brown VE, Pilkington CA, Feldman BM, Davidson JE; Network for Juvenile Dermatomyositis, Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS). An international consensus survey of the diagnostic criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Aug;45(8):990-3. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel025
7. Lundberg IE, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M, et al; International Myositis Classification Criteria Project consortium, The Euromyositis register and The Juvenile Dermatomyositis Cohort Biomarker Study and Repository (JDRG) (UK and Ireland). 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):1955-64. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468
8. Rider LG, Nistala K. The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathogenesis, clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, and outcomes. J Intern Med. 2016 Jul;280(1): 24-38. doi: 10.1111/joim.12444;
9. Sato JO, Sallum AM, Ferriani VP, et al; Rheumatology Committee of the Sгo Paulo Paediatrics Society. A Brazilian registry of juvenile dermatomyositis: onset features and classification of 189 cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 Nov-Dec;27(6):1031-8.
10. Gerami P, Walling HW, Lewis J, et al. A systematic review of juvenile-onset clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol. 2007 Oct;157(4):637-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08055.x
11. Bitencourt N, Solow EB, Wright T, Bermas BL. Inflammatory myositis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2020 Jun;29(7): 776-81. doi: 10.1177/0961203320918021
12. Stringer E, Singh-Grewal D, Feldman BM. Predicting the course of juvenile dermatomyositis: significance of early clinical and laboratory features. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov;58(11):3585-92. doi: 10.1002/art.23960
13. McCann LJ, Juggins AD, Maillard SM, et al; Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group. The Juvenile Dermatomyositis National Registry and Repository (UK and Ireland) – clinical characteristics of children recruited within the first 5 yr. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Oct;45(10):1255-60. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel099
14. Schänzer A, Rager L, Dahlhaus I, et al. Morphological Characteristics of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies in Juvenile Patients. Cells. 2021 Dec 30;11(1):109. doi: 10.3390/cells11010109
15. Pachman LM, Abbott K, Sinacore JM, et al. Duration of illness is an important variable for untreated children with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Pediatr. 2006 Feb;148(2): 247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.10.032
16. Sanner H, Aaløkken TM, Gran JT, et al. Pulmonary outcome in juvenile dermatomyositis: a case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):86-91. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.131433
17. Xia J, Jiang G, Jin T, et al. Respiratory symptoms as initial manifestations of interstitial lung disease in clinically amyopathic juvenile dermatomyositis: a case report with literature review. BMC Pediatr. 2021 Nov 3;21(1): 488. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02958-9
18. Orandi AB, Baszis KW, Dharnidharka VR, et al; CARRA Juvenile Myositis subgroup. Assessment, classification and treatment of calcinosis as a complication of juvenile dermatomyositis: a survey of pediatric rheumatologists by the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance (CARRA). Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017 Sep 21;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12969-017-0199-4.
19. Gargh K, Al-Abadi E, Low S, et al. Juvenile Dermatomyositis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (JIS) does not correlate with criteria for clinically inactive disease: a singlecentre retrospective evaluation. Rheumatol Int. 2021 Nov 18. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-05049-1
20. Kobayashi I, Akioka S, Kobayashi N, et al. Clinical practice guidance for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) 2018-Update. Mod Rheumatol. 2020 May;30(3):411-23. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1718866
21. Khelkovskaya-Sergeeva AN, Anan'eva LP, Kazakov DO, Nasonov EL. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(1):95-100. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2019-1-95-100
22. Christen-Zaech S, Seshadri R, Sundberg J, et al. Persistent association of nailfold capillaroscopy changes and skin involvement over thirty-six months with duration of untreated disease in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Feb;58(2):571-6. doi: 10.1002/art.23299
23. Ladd PE, Emery KH, Salisbury SR, et al. Juvenile dermatomyositis: correlation of MRI at presentation with clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W153-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5337
24. Miles L, Bove KE, Lovell D, et al. Predictability of the clinical course of juvenile dermatomyositis based on initial muscle biopsy: a retrospective study of 72 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1183-91. doi: 10.1002/art.22993
25. Patwardhan A. The Value of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis in the Current Transformed Era of Biologics. Cureus. 2020 Feb 19; 12(2):e7049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7049
26. Oddis CV, Reed AM, Aggarwal R, et al; RIM Study Group. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: a randomized, placebo-phase trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;65(2):314-24. doi: 10.1002/art.37754
27. Marrani E, Abu-Rumeileh S, Mastrolia MV, et al. A systematic review on biological therapies in juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: an evidence gap in precision medicine. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;40(2): 457-70. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
28. DeGuzman M, Singla S, Mizesko M, Sagcal-Gironella AC. Abatacept as Adjunct Therapy for the Calcinosis of Juvenile Dermatomyositis: A Single-Center Experience. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(suppl 4):89.
29. Arabshahi B, Silverman RA, Jones OY, Rider LG. Abatacept and sodium thiosulfate for treatment of recalcitrant juvenile dermatomyositis complicated by ulceration and calcinosis. J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;160(3):520-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.11.057
30. Sukumaran S, Vijayan V. Abatacept in the Treatment of Juvenile Dermatomyositis-Associated Calcifications in a 16-Year-Old Girl. Case Rep Rheumatol. 2020 May 28;2020: 4073879. doi: 10.1155/2020/4073879
Review
For citations:
Kaleda MI, Nikishina IP, Salugina SO, Fedorov ES, Arsenyeva SV, Shapovalenko AN, Pachkoria TN, Matkava VG. Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: results of an open single-center retrospective study. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2022;16(4):32-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2022-4-32-39