Baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice: pooled analysis of the overall patient cohort and a subgroup of patients with difficult-to-treat disease according to the Moscow registry
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2026-1-98-105
Abstract
Baricitinib (BARI) is widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, real-world data on its place in therapy and efficacy in patients with difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA are limited.
Objective: to assess the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with RA, including those in the D2T RA subgroup, the outcomes of BARI use in routine practice across different lines of therapy (LT) and switching strategies, as well as its steroid-sparing effect.
Material and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients included in the Moscow registry of immune-mediated inflammatory/autoimmune diseases who were followed up from 19.08.2021 to 26.12.2024 and were prescribed BARI. Data from three visits (V1–V3) with a 6-month interval were analyzed. Study endpoints were changes in DAS28-ESR/CRP, CDAI/SDAI, tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), patient and physician global assessment of disease activity; the proportion of patients in remission and with low disease activity; the number of patients receiving glucocorticoids (GCs) and methotrexate (MTX), as well as GCs and MTX doses. Current therapy at the time of the study and prior therapy were analyzed; a separate analysis was performed for the D2T RA subgroup.
Results and discussion. The study included 188 patients (82% women); mean age was 56.0±12.1 years; median RA duration was 11 (7–18) years. The mean follow-up duration was 12.6 (2.3–29.7) months. The intervals between visits averaged 6.5 months. The D2T RA subgroup included 17 (9%) patients. BARI was prescribed as 1st LT in 62.2% of patients, as 2nd LT in 14.9%, and as 3rd LT in 22.9%; 62.2% of patients had not previously received biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), whereas 37.8% were switched to BARI from bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. By V3, with BARI used as 1st LT, the median DAS28-ESR decreased from 3.4 to 3.1 (-8.8%; p<0.05); as 2nd LT, from 3.3 to 2.9 (-12.1%); and as 3rd LT, from 4.1 to 2.9 (-29.3%); the median DAS28-CRP decreased by 6.9%, 6.9%, and 24.1%, respectively. The greatest reduction in activity indices was observed after switching from interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i): the median DAS28-ESR decreased from 4.02 to 2.99 (-25.6%; p=0.0174) and CDAI from 14.47 to 10.88 (-24.8%). The smallest decrease in indices was recorded after prior therapy with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). In such patients, DAS28-ESR decreased on average by 3.0%, while CDAI increased by 9.1%. In the D2T RA group, a significant reduction in SJC (-74.1%) and TJC (-59.6%) was noted (p<0.05), with a clinically noticeable but statistically non-significant decrease in DAS28-ESR (-18.3%), DAS28-CRP (-23.8%), CDAI (-34.6%), and SDAI (-39.4%). By V3, in 52.1% of patients (p<0.05) it was possible to reduce the GCs dose (21.7%) or discontinue GCs completely (30.4%); the MTX dose and the proportion of patients receiving it also decreased.
Conclusion. In real-world practice, BARI therapy provided a reduction in RA activity across different LT and demonstrated a steroid-sparing effect. Even in patients with D2T RA, a clinically meaningful decrease in arthritis activity was observed. The most favorable switching outcomes were noted in patients previously treated with IL-6i, whereas in patients who had used JAKi, the effect of BARI was limited, which is associated with a change in the mechanism of action when another drug is prescribed. These findings require confirmation in prospective studies.
About the Authors
Yu. A. GavrikovaRussian Federation
3, Pekhotnaya Street, Moscow 123182, Russia;
30, Bolshaya Tatarskaya Street, Moscow 115184, Russia
V. V. Dolgov
Russian Federation
3, Pekhotnaya Street, Moscow 123182, Russia;
30, Bolshaya Tatarskaya Street, Moscow 115184, Russia
E. N. Simonova
Russian Federation
3, Pekhotnaya Street, Moscow 123182, Russia;
A. I. Zagrebneva
Russian Federation
Alena Igorevna Zagrebneva
3, Pekhotnaya Street, Moscow 123182, Russia;
41, Kirochnaya Street, Saint Petersburg 191015, Russia
References
1. Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):3-18. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223356.
2. Hofman ZLM, Roodenrijs NMT, Nikiphorou E, et al. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned and what do we still need to learn? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jan 1;64(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae544.
3. Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):652-662. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608345.
4. Hernandez-Cruz B, Kiltz U, Avouac J, et al. Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Dec;10(6):1417-1457. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00591-9.
5. Garcia-Vivar ML, Prior-Espaсol A, Fakhouri W, et al. Patient Profile and Outcomes Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Baricitinib Versus Other Therapies in Spain: The RA-BE-REAL Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Oct;12(5):889-907. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00781-7.
6. Alten R, Burmester GR, Matucci-Cerinic M, et al. The RA-BE-REAL Multinational, Prospective, Observational Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Baricitinib, Targeted Synthetic, or Biologic Disease-Modifying Therapies: a 6-Month Interim Analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Dec;10(6):1575-1595. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00597-3.
7. Taylor PC, Laedermann C, Alten R, et al. A JAK Inhibitor for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Baricitinib Experience. J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 6;12(13):4527. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134527.
8. Conigliaro P, Minerba C, Vendola A, et al. The steroid-sparing effect of JAK inhibitors across multiple patient populations. Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1376476. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1376476.
9. Edwards CJ, Krönke G, Avouac J, et al. Baricitinib Dose Reduction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Achieving Sustained Disease Control: Final Results From the RA-BEYOND Study. J Rheumatol. 2025 Apr 1;52(4):316-322. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0906.
10. Nagy G, Roodenrijs NMT, Welsing PM, et al. EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan;80(1):31-35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217344.
11. Cincinelli G, Maioli G, Posio C, et al. Truth unveiled by time and the marbled definition of D2T-RA: retrospective analysis on the persistence of the difficult-to-treat status among refractory RA patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2024 Sep 17;26(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03390-x.
12. Taylor PC, Takeuchi T, Burmester GR, et al. Safety of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a median of 4.6 and up to 9.3 years of treatment: final results from long-term extension study and integrated database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Mar;81(3): 335-343. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221276.
Review
For citations:
Gavrikova YA, Dolgov VV, Simonova EN, Zagrebneva AI. Baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice: pooled analysis of the overall patient cohort and a subgroup of patients with difficult-to-treat disease according to the Moscow registry. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2026;20(1):98-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2026-1-98-105
JATS XML




































