Comparative efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilar (BCD-055) and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (results of international, multiple-center, double-blind phase I and phase III clinical studies)

This article presents results from two clinical trials of infliximab biosimilar, BCD-055, including comparative data on the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of BCD-055 and innovator infliximab (IFX) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Objective: The purpose of phase I clinical study ASART-1 was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of BCD-055 and to prove its equivalence with Remicade®, phase III study ASART-2 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of BCD-055 in comparison with Remicade® in patients with active AS.

Patients and methods: Both studies were conducted as international multi-center randomized double-blind studies in direct comparison with innovator IFX. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, main examination methods, and drug regimens were the same in both trials. A total of 199 patients were enrolled in the studies. After the screening, the patients were stratified by CRP and BASDAI score, randomized (1:1 ratio in ASART-1; 2:1 ratio in ASART-2) into 2 arms and received BCD-055 or innovator IFX at a dose 5 mg/kg IV at 0, 2, 6 and then every 8 weeks (up to week 54). The primary endpoint for PK profile evaluation was the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-tau)), maximum serum concentration of infliximab at steady state Cmax,ss. Efficacy was assessed by achieving ASAS20 at week 30, the endpoints for safety profile were the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events during the maintenance-dosing phase and withdrawals from the study due to the safety reasons.

Results: A total of 81 patients (ASART-1 study) were included in PK analysis, 199 patients were in efficacy and safety analysis. AUC(0-tau) value were 25,420,996.25±11,635,015.74 (ng/ml) Cmax,ss for BCD-055 and 26,114,705.71±12,102,376.9 (ng/ml)⋅h for INF innovator (p>0.05). Cmax,ss for BCD-055/Remicade® was 122,752 [99,401–151,553] ng/ml and 119,844 [98,120–132,772] ng/ml, respectively (p>0.05). ASAS20 was achieved at week 30 by 81.30% of the patients in the BCD-055 group, and 67.74% in the INF innovator group (p=0.061). The analysis of secondary endpoints (BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI, MASES, quality of life, chest excursion, and number of pathologically changed joints) showed no difference between the biosimilar and innovator groups. BCD-055 and innovator IFX showed highly similar safety profiles in both studies without cases of unexpected toxicity. The rates of AEs were equivalent for both drugs and were 48.48% and 58.21% of patients in the BCD-055 and Remicade®, respectively.

Conclusion: BCD-055 is found to be equivalent in terms of PK, and showed the similarity in efficacy and safety profile compared with innovator IFX in patients with active AS.

1. Kalliolias GD, Ivashkiv LB. TNF biology, pathogenic mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies. Nature reviews Rheumatology. 2016;12(1):49-62. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.169.

2. Aggarwal BB, Gupta SC, Kim JH. Historical perspectives on tumor necrosis factor and its superfamily: 25 years later, a golden journey. Blood. 2012;119(3):651-65. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-04-325225.

3. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Генно-инженерные биологические препараты в лечении ревматоидного артрита. Москва: ИМА-ПРЕСС; 2013. 552 с. [Nasonov EL, editor. Genno- inzhenernye biologicheskie preparaty v lechenii revmatoidnogo artrita [Genetically engineered biological agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis]. Moscow: IMA-PRESS; 2013. 552 p.]

4. Dö rner T, Kay J. Biosimilars in rheumatology: Current perspectives and lessons learnt. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Dec; 11(12):713-24. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.110. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

5. Dörner T, Strand V, Castaneda-Hernandez G, et al. The role of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Mar;72(3):322-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202715. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

6. Насонов ЕЛ. Биоаналоги в ревматологии. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2016;54(6):628-640. [Nasonov EL. Biosimilars in rheumatology. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(6):628-640. (In Russ.).] doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016-628-640

7. Declerck P, Danesi R, Petersel D, Jacobs I. The Language of Biosimilars: Clarification, Definitions, and Regulatory Aspects. Drugs. 2017 Apr;77(6):671-677. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0717-1.

8. Guideline on similar biological medical products. European Medical Agency. VHMP/437/04.London, 30 October 2005. http:/www.emea.eu.int

9. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs), annex 2. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2013;977:53-89.

10. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Biosimilars approved in Europe. [February 24, 2017]. http://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Biosimilars-approvedin-Europe

11. Park W, Hrycaj P, Jeka S, et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Oct;72(10): 1605-12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203091. Epub 2013 May 16.

12. Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Oct;72(10):1613-20. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090. Epub 2013 May 16.

13. Eng GP, Bentzen K, Bliddal H, et al. Antibodies to Infliximab and Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Remission: A Cross-Sectional Study. Arthritis. 2015;2015:784825. doi: 10.1155/2015/784825. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

14. Вaert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al. Influence of immunogenicity on the longterm efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):601-8.

15. Bito T, Nishikawa R, Hatakeyama M, et al. Influence of neutralizing antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab on the treatment of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Apr;170(4): 922-9. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12791.

16. van der Heijde D, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, et al. Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT). Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb;52(2):582-91.

17. Wollina U, Hansel G, Koch A, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitorinduced psoriasis or psoriasiform exanthemata: first 120 cases from the literature including a series of six new patients. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9(1):1–14.

18. Harrison MJ, Dixon WG, Watson KD, et al. Rates of new-onset psoriasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving antitumour necrosis factor alpha therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Feb;68(2):209-15. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.087288. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

19. Collamer AN, Battafarano DF. Psoriatic skin lesions induced by tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy: clinical features and possible immunopathogenesis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;40(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jun 26.

20. Joyau C, Veyrac G, Dixneuf V, Jolliet P. Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy and increased risk of de novo psoriasis: is it really a paradoxical side effect? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):700-6. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

21. Shmidt E, Wetter DA, Ferguson SB, Pittelkow MR. Psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis associated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors: the Mayo Clinic experience, 1998 to 2010. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Nov;67(5):e179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

22. Toussirot E, Aubin F. Paradoxical reactions under TNF-α blocking agents and other biological agents given for chronic immunemediated diseases: an analytical and comprehensive overview. RMD Open. 2016;2(2):e000239. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2015- 000239.

23. Collamer AN, Guerrero KT, Henning JS, Battafarano DF. Psoriatic skin lesions induced by tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy: a literature review and potential mechanisms of action. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):996-1001. doi: 10.1002/art.23835.

24. Seneschal J, Milpied B, Vergier B, et al. Cytokine imbalance with increased production of interferon-α in psoriasiform eruptions associated with antitumour necrosis factor-α treatments. Br J Dermatol. 2009 Nov;161(5): 1081-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2133.2009.09329.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

25. Charles PJ, Smeenk RJ, De Jong J, et al. Assessment of antibodies to double-stranded DNA induced in rheumatoid arthritis patients following treatment with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha: findings in open-label and randomized placebo-controlled trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Nov;43(11):2383-90.

26. De Rycke L, Kruithof E, Van Damme N, et al. Antinuclear antibodies following infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr;48(4):1015-23. doi:10.1002/art.10876

27. Bacquet-Deschryver H, Jouen F, Quillard M, et al. Impact of three anti- TNFalpha biologics on existing and emergent autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthropathy patients. J Clin Immunol. 2008 Sep;28(5):445-55. doi: 10.1007/s10875-008-9214-3. Epub 2008 Jun 28.

28. Almoallim H, Al-Ghamdi Y, Almaghrabi H, Alyasi O. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Induced Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Open Rheumatol J. 2012;6: 315-9. doi: 10.2174/1874312901206010315. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

29. Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Munoz S, et al. Autoimmune Diseases Induced by TNF- Targeted Therapies: Analysis of 233 Cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007 Jul;86(4):242-51. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181441a68

30. Williams EL, Gadola S, Edwards CJ. Anti-TNF-induced lupus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Jul;48(7):716-20. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep080. Epub 2009 May 4.

31. Roach DR, Bean AG, Demangel C, et al. TNF regulates chemokine induction essential for cell recruitment, granuloma formation, and clearance of mycobacterial infection. J Immunol. 2002 May 1;168(9):4620-7.

32. Bruns H, Meinken C, Schauenberg P, et al. Anti-TNF immunotherapy reduces CD8+ T cell- mediated antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in humans. J Clin Invest. 2009 May;119(5): 1167-77. doi: 10.1172/JCI38482. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

33. Xie X, Li F, Chen JW, Wang J. Risk of tuberculosis infection in anti-TNF-a biological therapy: From bench to bedside. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014 Aug;47(4): 268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 May 30.

34. Борисов СЕ, Лукина ГВ. Рекомендации по скринингу и мониторингу туберкулёзной инфекции у больных, получающих генно-инженерные биологические препараты. [Borisov SE, Lukina GV. Recommendations for screening and monitoring of tuberculosis infection in patients treated with genetically engineered biological agents. (In Russ.)]. http://www.rheumatolog.ru/system/files/pdf/nacrec/natrec21.pdf

35. Каратеев ДЕ. Вопросы иммуногенности биологических препаратов: теория и практика. Современная ревматология. 2009;3(1):67-72. [Karateev DE. The problems of the immunogenicity of biologicals: theory and practice. Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2009;3(1):67-72. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2009-527

36. Emi Aikawa N, de Carvalho JF, Artur Almeida Silva C, Bonfa E. Immunogenicity of Anti- TNF-alpha agents in autoimmune diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010 Apr;38(2-3):82-9. doi: 10.1007/s12016-009-8140-3.

37. De Vries MK, Wolbink GJ, Stapel SO, et al. Decreased clinical response to infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis is correlated with anti-infliximab formation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Sep;66(9):1252-4. Epub 2007 May 1. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.072397.

38. Scheinberg M, Gomez-Reino JJ. Therapy: The NICE position on indications for biologics and biosimilars. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 2016 May;12(5):255–256. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.56

39. Dö rner T, Strand V, Cornes P, et al. The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6): 974-82. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209166. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

40. Mulcahy AW, Predmore Z, Mattke S. The Cost Savings Potential of Biosimilar Drugs in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2014.

41. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. EMEA/CHMP/BMWP/42832/2005 Rev1. 2014