Preview

Modern Rheumatology Journal

Advanced search

A very early clinical response to treatment with the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the dynamics of pain and central sensitization elements

https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-2-69-75

Abstract

Janus kinase (JK) inhibitors block the intracellular signaling pathways that are responsible for the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and mediators, which in turn cause the activation of pain receptors and central sensitization (CS). It is suggested that JK inhibitors can rapidly eliminate pain and reduce the severity of CS.
Objective: to evaluate the effect of the JK inhibitor tofacitinib (TOFA) on the intensity of pain and the signs of CS in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 7 and 28 days after therapy initiation.
Patients and methods. A study group consisted of 39 patients (79.5% female) (mean age 50.9±11.1 years) with RA (DAS28 5.8±0.6). Of these, 89.7% were seropositive for rheumatoid factor; 82.0% took methotrexate and 18.0% received leflunomide. All the patients were prescribed TOFA 5 mg twice daily due to the inefficacy or intolerance of biological agents. The investigators estimated pain intensity using a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), rated the presence of a neuropathic pain component (NPC) with the PainDETECT questionnaire, and assessed the signs of CS with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) during the first 4 weeks after TOFA administration.
Results and discussion. The patients initially experienced moderate or severe pain (the mean scores of 5.33±2.51 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) included in BPI); 53.8% had signs of CS (CSI scores of ≥40); 17.9% had signs of a NPC (PainDETECT scores of >18). Already on day 7 after the start of TOFA administration, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean NRS pain intensity scores to 4.06±2.2 (p=0.01) and by 29.4±17.9%, as shown by the patient's assessment of the analgesic effect of therapy (BPI), as well as the severity of CS, namely a decrease in the mean NRS pain score to 35.9±11.2 (p=0.01). On 28 days, the effect became better: there was a reduction in the level of NRS pain to 2.32±1.57 (p<0.001), in pain according to the patient's assessment of the analgesic effect of therapy to 43.6±29.6%; in the median PainDETECT score to 2.5 [0; 8.7] (p<0.001); and in CSI scores to an average of 26.4±13.9 (p <0.001). No serious adverse reactions were noted.
TOFA has a rapid analgesic effect, which allows it to be considered as a chooser for pathogenetic therapy in patients with active RA and severe pain, especially in the presence of CS signs and secondary fibromyalgia. Undoubtedly, large-scale, long-term controlled studies with a wider range of estimated parameters are required to clarify the therapeutic potential of TOFA in this patient category. The limitation of this investigation was its open observer design pattern.
Conclusion. The use of the JK inhibitor TOFA can achieve a rapid analgesic effect, inter alia due to its effect on CS and NPC.

About the Authors

A. E. Karateev
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Andrey Evgenyevich Karateev

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



E. S. Filatova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522


E. Yu. Pogozheva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522


V. N. Amirdzhanova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522


E. L. Nasonov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University , Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
8, Trubetskaya St., Build. 2, Moscow 119991


A. M. Lila
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Department of Rheumatology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
2/1, Barrikadnaya St., Build. 1, Moscow 125993 



V. I. Mazurov
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015


A. Yu. De
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015


A. A. Baranov
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
5, Revolyutsionnaya St., Yaroslavl 150000


N. A. Lapkina
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
5, Revolyutsionnaya St., Yaroslavl 150000


G. V. Lukina
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research and Practical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow 111123


N. A. Kiryukhina
N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Ministry of Heath of Russia
Russian Federation
70, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow 105203


S. Yu. Davidyan
N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Ministry of Heath of Russia
Russian Federation
70, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow 105203


T. S. Salnikova
Tula Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
58, F. Engels St., Tula 300035


R. R. Samigullina
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015


D. S. Chakieva
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015


I. M. Marusenko
Petrozavodsk State Medical University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russia
Russian Federation
33, Lenin Prospect, Petrozavodsk 185910


O. V. Semagina
V.D. Seredavin Samara Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
159, Tashkentskaya St., Samara 443095


M. Yu. Semchenkova
Smolensk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
28, Krupskaya St., Smolensk 214019


A. F. Davydova
Prof. S.V. Ochapovsky Territorial Clinical Hospital One, Research Institute
Russian Federation
167, First May St., Krasnodar 350086


E. V. Kalinina
Volgograd State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
1, Pavshikh Bortsov St, Volgograd 400131


References

1. Nasonov EL, editor. Rossiiskie klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Revmatologiya [Russian clinical guidelines. Rheumatology]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. 446 p.

2. Nasonov EL, Lila AM. Rheumatoid arthritis: achievements and unresolved problems. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2019;91(5):4-7. (In Russ.).

3. Nasonov EL. New approaches to pharmacotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis: tofacitinib. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014; 52(2):209-21. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2014-209-221

4. Nasonov EL, Avdeeva AS, Lila AM. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (Part I). Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020; 58(1):62-79. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/19954484-2020-62-79

5. Malemud CJ. The role of the JAK/STAT signal pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2018 Jun;10(5-6): 117-27. doi: 10.1177/1759720X18776224. Epub 2018 May 19.

6. Salaffi F, Giacobazzi G, Di Carlo M. Chronic Pain in Inflammatory Arthritis: Mechanisms, Metrology, and Emerging Targets-A Focus on the JAK-STAT Pathway. Pain Res Manag. 2018 Feb 7;2018:8564215. doi: 10.1155/2018/8564215. eCollection 2018.

7. Korotaeva TV, Loginova EYu. Results of studying the clinical efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(2):112-8. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-20192-112-118

8. Wang TS, Tsai TF. Tofacitinib in psoriatic arthritis. Immunotherapy. 2017 Nov;9(14): 1153-63. doi: 10.2217/imt-2017-0087. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

9. Guler MA, Celik OF, Ayhan FF. The important role of central sensitization in chronic musculoskeletal pain seen in different rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jan; 39(1):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s10067-01904749-1. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

10. Neblett R, Hartzell MM, Mayer TG, et al. Establishing Clinically Relevant Severity Levels for the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2017 Feb;17(2):166-75. doi: 10.1111/papr.12440. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

11. Chiarotto A, Viti C, Sulli A, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Italian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Oct;37:20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

12. Latysheva NV. Comorbid diseases in patients with chronic migraine. Diss. doct. med. sci. Moscow; 2020. 260 p.

13. Perez-Baos S, Gratal P, Barrasa JI, et al. Inhibition of pSTAT1 by tofacitinib accounts for the early improvement of experimental chronic synovitis. J Inflamm (Lond). 2019 Jan 29;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12950-019-0206-2. eCollection 2019.

14. McGarry T, Orr C, Wade S, et al. JAK/STAT Blockade Alters Synovial Bioenergetics, Mitochondrial Function, and Proinflammatory Mediators in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Dec;70(12): 1959-70. doi: 10.1002/art.40569. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

15. Garbers C, Aparicio-Siegmund S, RoseJohn S. The IL-6/gp130/STAT3 signaling axis: recent advances towards specific inhibition. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015 Jun;34:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

16. Kojima H, Inoue T, Kunimoto H, Nakajima K. IL-6-STAT3 signaling and premature senescence. JAKSTAT. 2013 Oct 1; 2(4):e25763. doi: 10.4161/jkst.25763. Epub 2013 Jul 22.

17. Boyce EG, Vyas D, Rogan EL, et al. Impact of tofacitinib on patient outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis – review of clinical studies. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Jan 14; 7:1-12. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S62879. eCollection 2016.

18. Wallenstein GV, Kanik KS, Wilkinson B, et al. Effects of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of two Phase 2 randomised controlled trials. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 May-Jun; 34(3):430-42. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

19. Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a double-blind, placebocontrolled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul;60(7):1895-905. doi: 10.1002/art.24567

20. Strand V, de Vlam K, СovarrubiasСobos JA, et al. Effect of tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the phase III, randomised controlled trial: OPal Beyond. RMD Open 2019;5:e000808. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000808


Review

For citations:


Karateev AE, Filatova ES, Pogozheva EY, Amirdzhanova VN, Nasonov EL, Lila AM, Mazurov VI, De AY, Baranov AA, Lapkina NA, Lukina GV, Kiryukhina NA, Davidyan SY, Salnikova TS, Samigullina RR, Chakieva DS, Marusenko IM, Semagina OV, Semchenkova MY, Davydova AF, Kalinina EV. A very early clinical response to treatment with the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the dynamics of pain and central sensitization elements. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2020;14(2):69-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-2-69-75

Views: 1310


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1996-7012 (Print)
ISSN 2310-158X (Online)