Preview

Modern Rheumatology Journal

Advanced search

Results of direct comparison of the clinical efficacy of ixekizumab and adalimumab: data from the SPIRIT H2H study

https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-3-50-56

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the data available in the literature on the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab (IXE) and adalimumab (ADA) via their direct comparisons in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Patients and methods. The results of the SPIRIT H2H study were analyzed, the aim of which was to investigate the potential superiority of IXE to ADA for arthritis and skin manifestations in a group of patients with active PsA, stable plaque psoriasis with an inadequate response to synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) who had not previously received biological agents (BAs).
Design: a 52-week multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study. The patients were randomized 1:1 to open IXE or ADA administration groups for 52 weeks. This review presents the data obtained at 24-week follow-up.
Of the 684 screened patients, 566 (82.7%) were included in the study; moreover, the distribution of the patients was equal between the ADA (n=283) and IXE (n=283) groups. At 6 months, 269 (95%) patients in the ADA group and 262 (93%) in the IXE one continued to participate in the study. Efficacy analysis was made based on the achievement of the primary endpoint that was considered to be related to the relative number of patients, who had simultaneously achieved improvements in the joints and skin according to the ACR50 and PASI100 criteria.

Results and discussion. At 24 weeks, the proportion of patients who had simultaneously achieved ACR50 and PASI100 responses was significantly higher in the IXE group (36%) than in the ADA one (28%) (p=0.036). It was found that the IXE group was not inferior to the ADA one in terms of ACR50 response rates (in 51% (IXE) and 47% (ADA) patients) and was superior in achieving PASI100 response rates (in 60% (IXE) and 47% (ADA) patients) (p=0.001). The IXE group was recorded to have a higher response than the ADA group and in terms of other manifestations of the disease: the severity of skin and nail psoriasis, enthesitis, remission achievement, minimal and very low disease activity, and improved quality of life. Comparable effectiveness was noted for the effect of the drugs on dactylitis, as well as for the simultaneous achievement of remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis according DAPSA. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded in 8.5% (ADA) and 3.5% (IXE) patients.
The safety and tolerability of both BAs corresponded to their previously presented safety profile. The findings were also confirmed at 52-week follow-up, presented at the Meetings of the American College of Rheumatology in November 2019 and the European League Against Rheumatism in June 2020, and published in the leading journals of rheumatology.

Conclusion. The first randomized placebo-controlled study (SPIRIT H2H) directly comparing the two BAs with different mechanisms of action demonstrated the advantage of IXE over ADA in simultaneously reducing the activity of arthritis and psoriasis and showed their comparable efficacy comparable efficacy regarding joint symptoms. The use of IXE versus ADA was accompanied by the more frequent achievement of a combined endpoint related to the signs of joint and skin damages in patients with PSA, as well as by the quantitatively lower frequency of SAEs in patients with active PSA who had failed previous sDMARD therapy. The findings are of great importance for clinical practice from the point of view of the reasonable choice of a treatment strategy in these patients.

About the Author

T. V. Korotaeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Tatiana Viktorovna Korotaeva

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



References

1. Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb A, Morita A, et al. The contribution of joint and skin improvements to the health-related quality of life of patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep;78(9):1215-19. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-215003. Epub 2019 May 21.

2. Kavanaugh A, Helliwell P, Ritchlin CT. Psoriatic arthritis and burden of disease: patient perspectives from the populationbased multinational assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (MAPP) survey. Rheumatol Ther. 2016 Jun;3(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s40744-016-0029-z. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

3. Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, et al. Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):2-29. doi: 10.1002/acr.23789. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

4. Kerschbaumer A, Smolen J, Dougados M, et al. Pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature research for the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):778-86. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217163. Epub 2020 May 7.

5. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 May;68(5):1060-71. doi: 10.1002/art.39573. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

6. Zisapel M, Zisman D, Madar-Balakirski N, et al. Prevalence of TNF-α blocker immunogenicity in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):73-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140685. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

7. Vogelzang EH, Kneepkens EL, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Anti-adalimumab antibodies and adalimumab concentrations in psoriatic arthritis; an association with disease activity at 28 and 52 weeks of follow-up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2178-82. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205554. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

8. Mease P, Collier D, Saunders K, et al. Comparative effectiveness of biologic monotherapy versus combination therapy for patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from the CORRONA registry. RMD Open. 2015 Dec 30;1(1):e000181. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen2015-000181. eCollection 2015.

9. McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Kirkham B, et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1137-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61134-5. Epub 2015 Jun 28.

10. Sherlock JP, Joyce-Shaikh B, Turner SP, et al. IL-23 induces spondyloarthropathy by acting on ROR-γt+ CD3+CD4–CD8entheseal resident T cells. Nat Med. 2012 Jul 1; 18(7):1069-76. doi: 10.1038/nm.2817.

11. McGonagle D, McInnes I, Kirkham B, et al. The role of IL-17A in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: recent advances and controversies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep;78(9):1167-78. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215356. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

12. Calip GS, Patel PR, Adimadhyam S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a cohort of adults with rheumatologic conditions. Int J Cancer. 2018 Sep 1;143(5):1062-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31407. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

13. Li X, Andersen KM, Chang HY, et al. Comparative risk of serious infections among real-world users of biologics for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb; 79(2):285-91. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis2019-216102. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

14. Lilly E. Taltz product monograph. Toronto; 2018.

15. Liu L, Lu J, Allan BW, et al. Generation and characterization of ixekizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin-17A. J Inflamm Res. 2016 Apr 19;9:39-50. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S100940.eCollection 2016.

16. Mease PJ, Smolen JS, Behrens F, et al. SPIRIT H2H study group. A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded assessor trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):123-31. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis2019-215386. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

17. Gower-Rousseau C, Salomez JL, Dupas JL, et al. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in northern France (19881990). Gut. 1994 Oct;35(10):1433-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.10.1433.

18. Smolen JS, Schols M, Braun J, et al. Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international Task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):3-17. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211734. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

19. Busquets-Perez N, Rodriguez-Moreno J, Gуmez-Vaquero C, et al. Relationship between psoriatic arthritis and moderatesevere psoriasis: analysis of a series of 166 psoriatic arthritis patients selected from a hospital population. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;31(1):139-43. doi: 10.1007/s10067-0111787-1. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

20. Feldman SR, Zhao Y, Shi L, et al. Economic and comorbidity burden among moderateto-severe psoriasis patients with comorbid psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 May;67(5):708-17. doi: 10.1002/acr.22492.

21. Muller B, Stekhoven D, Villiger P. Major differences in the pattern of joint swelling and tenderness in a large psoriatic arthritis cohort – results from an exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:S141.

22. Tillett W, Lin CY, Trevelin Sprabery A, et al. Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Work Productivity Loss in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Post-Hoc Analysis of SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 Trials. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 May 11. Online ahead of print.

23. Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Ritchlin CT, et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3279-89. doi: 10.1002/art.21306.

24. Mease PJ, van der Heijde D, Ritchlin CT, et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):79-87. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209709. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

25. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2317-27. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(17)31429-0. Epub 2017 May 24.

26. Smolen JS, Mease P, Tahir H, et al. Multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab versus adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis naive to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug: final results by week 52. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jul 13;annrheumdis-2020-217372. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217372. Online ahead of print.


Review

For citations:


Korotaeva TV. Results of direct comparison of the clinical efficacy of ixekizumab and adalimumab: data from the SPIRIT H2H study. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2020;14(3):50-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-3-50-56

Views: 678


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1996-7012 (Print)
ISSN 2310-158X (Online)