Comparative efficacy of tofacitinib and adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis in real clinical practice. Data from the Russian nationwide register of patients with psoriatic arthritis
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2021-3-35-42
Abstract
Objective: to compare the clinical efficacy in real clinical practice of the targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (sDMARD) tofacitinib (TOFA) and the biologic DMARD (bDMARD), an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), adalimumab (ADA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), included in the Russian nationwide register of patients with PsA.
Patients and methods. The study included 77 patients with PsA (43 men and 34 women) who met the CASPAR criteria and were observed in the Russian nationwide register. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the treatment. Group 1, in which oral TOFA was prescribed, 5 mg 2 times a day, included 41 patients: 24 (58.5%) men and 17 (41.5%) women, the median age was 41 [34; 50] years, the median duration of PsA was 72 [35; 120] months. Group 2, in which subcutaneous ADA was used, 40 mg every 2 weeks, included 36 patients: 19 (52.8%) men and 17 (47.2%) women, the median age was 44 [34; 51] years, the median duration of PsA was 59 [22; 102] months. Combination therapy, including methotrexate (MT), received 80.5% of patients in the TOFA group and 52.8% of patients in the ADA group. At the beginning of the study and every 6 months further, the activity and efficacy of PsA therapy were assessed in all patients according to DAPSA and criteria for minimal disease activity – MDA (number of painful joints ≤1, number of swollen joints ≤1, PASI ≤1 or BSA ≤3 , pain score ≤15, patient's general assessment of disease activity ≤20 mm on a visual analogue scale, HAQ ≤0.5, enthesitis ≤1), dynamics of BASDAI and BSA were also assessed. The number of patients who achieved remission (DAPSA ≤4) or MDA (5 criteria out of 7) during therapy with TOFA and ADA was determined.
Results and discussion. Before the start of the therapy in the 1st group, the median DAPSA was 44.2 [37.8; 55.3]: moderate PsA activity was in 5 (12.2%) patients, high in 36 (87.8%) patients. In group 2, the median DAPSA was 35.8 [21.1; 52]: low activity was detected in 3 (8.6%), moderate – in 11 (31.4%), high – in 21 (60%) patients (data from 35 patients was available). 6 months after the start of treatment in patients of the 1st and the 2nd group, there was a significant decrease in all indicators of PsA activity compared to the baseline. The median DAPSA was 11 [4.3; 17.3] and 9.1 [6; 19.6]; remissions according to DAPSA reached 11 (26.8%) and 6 (20.8%) patients, respectively, low activity – 15 (36.6%) and 13 (44.8%), MDA – 16 (40%) and 9 (30%). The number of patients with dactylitis in the 1st and in the 2nd group significantly decreased: from 22 (53.7%) to 5 (13.2%) and from 13 (36.1%) to 6 (20%), respectively. Median HAQ decreased from 1 [0.625; 1.5] to 0.5 [0; 0.875] and from 0.875 [0.5; 1.38] to 0.5 [0; 0.875]; median BASDAI – from 6 [4.2; 7] to 1.4 [0.6; 3.2] and from 4.4 [1.9; 5.8] to 3 [0.8; 4.5], respectively. In group 1, the number of patients with BSA> 3% decreased from 16 (39%) to 8 (26.7%; p<0.225), and in group 2, due to insufficient data (5 patients), we failed to evaluate BSA dynamics.
Conclusion. In real clinical practice TOFA and ADA both had comparable efficacy on all clinical manifestations of PsA: after 6 months of therapy, most patients with PsA achieved MDA, low disease activity and remission according to DAPSA and BASDAI.
About the Authors
E. Yu. LoginovaRussian Federation
Elena Yurievna Loginiva
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
T. V. Korotaeva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
E. E. Gubar
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
Yu. L. Korsakova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
S. I. Glukhova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
E. A. Vasilenko
Russian Federation
41, Kirochnaya st., St. Petersburg 191015, Russia
A. A. Vasilenko
Russian Federation
14, Pavla Levitta st., Veliky Novgorod 173008, Russia
N. A. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
189, Volgogradskaya st., Ekaterinburg 620102, Russia
I. M. Patrikeyeva
Russian Federation
55, Kotovskogo st., Tyumen 625023, Russia
E. L. Nasonov
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522, Russia
8, Trubetskaya St., Build. 2, Moscow 119991, Russia
References
1. Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P, et al. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii14-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.032482.
2. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 May;68(5):1060-71. doi: 10.1002/art.39573. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
3. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):700-12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159.
4. Murray K, Turk M, Alammari Y, et al. Long-term remission and biologic persistence rates: 12-year real-world data. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 13;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02380-z.
5. Haddad A, Gazitt T, Feldhamer I, et al. Treatment persistence of biologics among patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02417-x.
6. Merola JF, Lockshin B, Mody EA. Switching biologics in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Aug; 47(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7. Choy E. Clinical significance of Janus Kinase inhibitor selectivity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Mar 1;59(3):487-94. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez664.
8. Virtanen AT, Haikarainen T, Raivola J, Silvennoinen O. Selective JAKinibs: prospects in Inflammatory and Autoimmune diseases. BioDrugs. 2019 Feb;33(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00333-w.
9. Colbert RA, Ward MM. JAK inhibitors taking on psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1582-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1709907.
10. Mease P, Hall S, Fitzgerald O, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo for psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19; 377(16):1537-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615975.
11. Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, et al. Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1525-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615977.
12. Nash P, Coates LC, Fleischmann R, et al. Efficacy of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec; 5(2):567-82. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0131-5. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
13. Castro S, Masmitja J, Carlos M. Efficacy of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Adv Ther. 2021 Feb;38(2):868-84. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01585-7. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
14. Nasonov EL. New approaches to the pharmacotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis: tofacitinib. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2014;52(2):209-21. (In Russ.).
15. Dhillon S. Tofacitinib: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drugs. 2017 Dec;77(18): 1987-2001. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0835-9.
16. Berekmeri A, Mahmood F, Wittmann M, Helliwell P. Tofacitinib for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep;14(9):719-30. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1512404.
17. Loginova EYu, Korsakova YuL, Gubar' EE, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis in real clinical practice. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2020;58(3):268-75. (In Russ.).
18. Helliwell P, Coates LC, FitzGerald O, et al. Disease-specific composite measures for psoriatic arthritis are highly responsive to a Janus kinase inhibitor treatment that targets multiple domains of disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 29;20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1739-0.
19. Smolen JS, Mease P, Tahir H, et al. Multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel- group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab versus adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis naive to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug: final results by week 52. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Oct;79(10):1310-19. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217372. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
20. McInnes IB, Behrens F, Mease PJ, et al. Secukinumab versus adalimumab for treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (EXCEED): a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2020 May 9;395(10235):1496-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30564-X.
21. Mease P, Gladman DD, Collier DH, et al. Etanercept and Methotrexate as Monotherapy or in Combination for Psoriatic Arthritis: Primary Results From a Randomized, Controlled Phase III Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;71(7):1112-24. doi: 10.1002/art.40851. Epub 2019 May 28.
22. Lu C, Wallaceb BI, Waljee AK, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted DMARDs for active psoriatic arthritis during induction therapy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Dec;49(3):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
23. Deodhar A, Sliwinska-Stanczyk P, Xu H, et al. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a phase III, randomised, double- blind, placebocontrolled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Apr 27;annrheumdis-2020-219601. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219601. Online ahead of print.
24. Gubar E, Korotaeva T, Korsakova Y, et al. Effect of tofacitinib treatment on active MRI sacroiliitis and disease activity reduction in psoriatic arthritis patients. Data from clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:1162.
25. www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-shares-co-primary-endpoint-results-post-marketing
26. Instructions for the medical use of the tofacitinib (Yaquinus) № LP-002026-200820.
Review
For citations:
Loginova EY, Korotaeva TV, Gubar EE, Korsakova YL, Glukhova SI, Vasilenko EA, Vasilenko AA, Kuznetsova NA, Patrikeyeva IM, Nasonov EL. Comparative efficacy of tofacitinib and adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis in real clinical practice. Data from the Russian nationwide register of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2021;15(3):35–42. https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2021-3-35-42