Preview

Modern Rheumatology Journal

Advanced search

Experience in using Ketorol in osteoarthrosis patients with significant pain syndrome

https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2008-487

Abstract

Objective - to study the clinical efficacy and tolerability of two dosage forms of Ketorol (tablets and solution for injections) versus the similar formulations of diclofenac sodium in patients with osteoarthrosis (OA) in an open-labeled randomized study.
Patients and methods. The study covered 109 patients with OA (by the criteria developed by R. Altman et al.) with the knee joints being predominantly involved from 4 rheumatological centers of the Russian Federation. A study group comprised 51 female patients with gonarthrosis, treated with Ketorol (25 patients received the drug as tablets and 26 patients had it as injections) and a control group included 58 patients given diclofenac sodium (29 patients received it as tablets and 29 had it as injections). The duration of Ketorol therapy was 5 days. Both formulations for injection were used only for 2 days and then the patients were switched to tablets.
Results. Ketorol was found to be superior to diclofenac in short-term effectiveness (in relieving the pain syndrome) by 25-30%. Comparison of the results of treatment in the study and control groups showed a significantly more effective relief of the pain syndrome in those who received the drug as tablets. Both Ketorol formulations reduced the severity index by 25% whereas diclofenac did only by 15-18%. The same picture was also observed when the general condition of patients was evaluated by a physician. Analysis of WOMAK index changes indicated that by the end of the study, the percent of improvement with Ketorol use was much higher for both formulations (31% for tablets and 33% for injections) than that with diclofenac (18% and 6%). Pairwise comparison showed that the efficiency of Ketorol tablets was, in physician's opinion, much higher than that of diclofenac and the effectiveness of injections was comparable. However, the mean duration of Ketorol injections was twice greater (p = 0,003) than the similar formulation of diclofenac (426,3+153,2 min versus 288,3+173,1 min). There were no side effects of Ketorol on renal and hepatic function; no occult blood loss was found. Conclusion. The short-term use of Ketorol in severe gonarthrosis-caused pains results in a more marked improvement than that of diclofenac.

References

1. <div><p>Насонова В.А., Фоломеева О.М., Ш.Эрдес. Ревматические болезни в России в начале XXI века. Науч-практич ревматол 2003; 1: 6-10.</p><p>Насонов Е.Л. Нестероидные противовоспалительные препараты: новые аспекты применения в ревматологии и кардиологии. РМЖ 2003; 11(23): 1280-4.</p><p>Cassinelli E.H., Dean C.L., Garcia R.M. et al. Ketorolac use for postoperative pain management following lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Spine2008; 33(12): 1313-7.</p><p>Vlajkovic G., Sindjelic R., Stefanovic А. Ketorolac as a pre-emptive analgesic in retinal detachment surgery: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007; 45(5): 259-63.</p><p>Брагина Г.И., Виноградова Л.А., Горшкова Ю.М. и др. Болевой синдром в поликлинической практике. Вестник семейной медицины 2006; 2: 44-7.</p><p>Шостак Н.А., Аксенова А.В., Правдюк Н.Г Оптимизация комплексной терапии заболеваний внутренних органов с использованием кеторола. Леч врач 2006; 6: 83-5.</p><p>Altman R., Asch E., Eastham F.J. et al. Development of criteria for classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 1039-49.</p><p>Lequesne M.G. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumat 1997; 24: 779-81.</p></div><br />


Review

For citations:


Galushko EA, Vinogradova IB, Zotkin EG, Salikhov IG, Erdes S, Galushko EA, Vinogradova IB, Zotkin EG, Salikhov IG, Erdes S. Experience in using Ketorol in osteoarthrosis patients with significant pain syndrome. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2008;2(3):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2008-487

Views: 2787


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1996-7012 (Print)
ISSN 2310-158X (Online)