Comparison of muscle magnetic resonance imaging data with clinical and laboratory parameters in follow-up of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2025-2-26-31
Abstract
During dynamic follow-up of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), changes in disease activity and damage caused are assessed using several generally recognized instruments. In parallel, objective methods of visualization are used, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the muscles. Currently, the relationship between the results of MRI and clinical and laboratory parameters in dynamics is not well studied.
Objective: to evaluate the main signs of muscle involvement using MRI in dynamics and to compare them with clinical and laboratory parameters, activity indices and damage in patients with IIM.
Material and methods. The study included 32 patients with diseases from the group of IIM that met the EULAR/ACR 2017 classification criteria. All patients underwent MRI of the hip and calf muscles twice on the Philips Multiva 1.5 Tesla (Philips, The Netherlands) employing T1, T2, and STIR-T2 sequences, signs of oedema and fatty remodeling were assessed on a 4-point semiquantitative scale. The median time between examinations was 15.5 [9; 24] months. A standard clinical examination, including a manual muscle test (MMT-8), was performed at the initial and the second examinations of the patients. Disease activity was determined using the MITAX index and irreversible changes were assessed using the MDI damage index.
Results and discussion. During follow-up a statistically significant decrease in total oedema score and an increase in total fatty remodeling score in the thighs and calves was observed (p<0.05). The decrease in oedema total score in the thighs was associated with an increase in muscle strength according to the results of the MMT-8 (p=0.03), a decrease in creatine phosphokinase level (CPK; p=0.005) and activity index (p=0.003). The increase in the total thigh fatty replacement score was associated with a decrease in muscle strength according to the MMT-8 (p=0.01) and an increase in irreversible muscle changes according to the damage index (p=0.002). A decrease in total calves oedema score was associated with a decrease in CPK level (p=0.002) and activity index (p<0.001). A change in the total calves fatty replacement score was not associated with statistically significant changes in clinical and laboratory parameters of the disease.
Conclusion. Changes in the main signs of muscle involvement, oedema and fatty replacement, according to MRI showed a clear parallelism with the dynamics of clinical and laboratory indicators, which confirms the sensitivity of this method to changes in both the activity and severity of the disease. Thus, MRI of muscles in patients with muscle weakness makes it possible to distinguish the signs of inflammation from the manifestations of irreversible damage, which is of great importance for determining treatment tactics and prognosis.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. KolomeyichukRussian Federation
Alena Alekseevna Kolomeychuk
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
L. P. Ananyeva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. N. Helkovskaya-Sergeeva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. D. Koltakova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
L. V. Ptichkina
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
D. O. Kazakov
Russian Federation
2, Taldomskaya Street, Moscow 125412
References
1. Conticini E, Dourado E, Bottazzi F, et al. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: one year in review 2023. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;42(2):213-224. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/dh5o6c. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2. Lundberg IE, Fujimoto M, Vencovsky J, et al. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Dec 2;7(1):86. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00321-x.
3. Oldroyd AGS, Lilleker JB, Amin T, et al. British Society for Rheumatology Standards, Audit and Guidelines Working Group. British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of paediatric, adolescent and adult patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5; 61(5):1760-1768. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac115.
4. Antelava OA, Nasonov EL. Modern methods of assessment of activity and damage in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Nauchnoprakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2007;45(1): 59-62. (In Russ.).
5. Guimarгes F, Yildirim R, Isenberg DA. Long-term survival of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: anatomy of a single-centre cohort. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;41(2):322-329. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/486yh4. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6. Rider LG, Werth VP, Huber AM, et al. Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis: Physician and Patient/Parent Global Activity, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)/Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ), Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT), Disease Activity Score (DAS), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), physician global damage, Myositis Damage Index (MDI), Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT), Myositis Functional Index-2 (FI-2), Myositis Activities Profile (MAP), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI), Skindex, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S118-57. doi: 10.1002/acr.20532.
7. Rider LG, Aggarwal R, Machado PM, et al. Update on outcome assessment in myositis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018 May;14(5):303-318. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.33. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8. Goodwin DW. Imaging of skeletal muscle. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2011 May;37(2): 245-251, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2011.01.007.
9. Maurer B, Walker UA. Role of MRI in diagnosis and management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015 Nov;17(11):67. doi: 10.1007/s11926-015-0544-x.
10. Saygin D, Albayda J. Current approach to muscle imaging in myositis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2024 Nov 1;36(6):445-452. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000001043. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
11. Malartre S, Bachasson D, Mercy G, et al. MRI and muscle imaging for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Brain Pathol. 2021 May;31(3):e12954. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12954.
12. Day J, Patel S, Limaye V. The role of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in evaluation and management of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Apr;46(5):642-649. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
13. Kubinova K, Mann H, Vrana J, Vencovsky J. How Imaging Can Assist with Diagnosis and Monitoring of Disease in Myositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020 Aug 26;22(10):62. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-00939-y.
14. Keret S, Saygin D, Moghadam-Kia S, et al. Discordance between patient- and physician-reported disease activity in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Rheumato logy (Oxford). 2023 Dec 1;62(12):3957-3961. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead316.
15. Khelkovskaya-Sergeeva AN, Ananyeva LP, Kazakov DO, Nasonov EL. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(1):95-100. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2019-1-95-100.
16. Antelava OA, Smirnov AV, Rapoport IE, et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of muscle damage in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2007;(8):652 (In Russ.).
17. Barsotti S, Zampa V, Talarico R, et al. Thigh magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of disease activity in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies followed in a single center. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Oct; 54(4):666-72. doi: 10.1002/mus.25099. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
18. Fionda L, Lauletta A, Leonardi L, et al. Muscle MRI in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): implications for clinical management and treatment strategies. J Neurol. 2023 Feb;270(2):960-974. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11447-7. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
19. Spalkit S, Sinha A, Prakash M, Sandhu MS. Dermatomyositis: Patterns of MRI findings in muscles, fascia and skin of pelvis and thigh. Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109812. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109812.
20. Guimarгes JB, Nico MA, Omond AG, et al. Diagnostic Imaging of Inflammatory Myopathies: New Concepts and a Radiological Approach. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019 Feb 14;21(3):8. doi: 10.1007/s11926-019-0807-z.
21.
Review
For citations:
Kolomeyichuk AA, Ananyeva LP, Helkovskaya-Sergeeva AN, Koltakova AD, Ptichkina LV, Kazakov DO. Comparison of muscle magnetic resonance imaging data with clinical and laboratory parameters in follow-up of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2025;19(2):26-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2025-2-26-31