Preview

Modern Rheumatology Journal

Advanced search

Early-stage knee osteoarthritis: assessment of structural changes using imaging methods

https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2025-5-34-40

Abstract

Objective. To identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of structural changes in patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS).
Material and methods. The study included 78 women aged 35–68 years with knee pain lasting no longer than 1 year and minimal radiographic changes according to Kellgren–Lawrence grade 0–II (without joint space narrowing). A standardized individual record was completed for each patient, including anthropometric data (body mass index, BMI), disease history, results of clinical examination, assessment of knee pain by visual analogue scale, global health assessment by the patient, WOMAC index, KOOS scale, DN4 questionnaire, and information on comorbidities. All patients underwent standard radiography, ultrasound, knee MRI, and laboratory testing. MRI images were assessed using WORMS.
Results and discussion. At the early stage of OA, the most common MRI findings were synovitis (96.2%), cartilage changes (93.6%), and degenerative meniscal lesions (up to 89.7%). Osteophytes, mostly of small size, were detected in 38.5% of patients; osteitis and subchondral cysts were relatively rare (<15%). Correlation analysis showed no associations between synovitis, cartilage defects, and clinical/anthropometric parameters. Moderate but significant associations were observed between osteophytes, osteitis, meniscal lesions and patients’ age, BMI, metabolic syndrome (MS), and knee pain intensity. Comparative analysis of imaging modalities (MRI, ultrasound, and radiography) showed that the frequency of osteophyte detection by MRI (38.5%) was comparable to radiography (34.6%), while ultrasound detected significantly fewer cases (16.6%). MRI demonstrated the highest diagnostic yield for synovitis (96.2%), surpassing ultrasound (84.6%) and clinical examination (23%) (p<0.05).
Conclusion. MRI is a valuable tool for visualizing structural changes in early OA. In patients with such clinical risk factors as older age, increased BMI, MS, pain, and clinically detected synovitis, MRI can be considered a justified method for verifying early OA signs. Significant correlations between MRI changes and clinical parameters provide prospects for improving early OA diagnosis.

About the Authors

A. R. Khalmetova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Alsu Ravilievna Khalmetova 

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



A. M. Lila
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology ; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 

2/1, Barrikadnaya Street, Build. 1, Moscow 125993 



E. A. Taskina
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



L. I. Alekseeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology ; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 

2/1, Barrikadnaya Street, Build. 1, Moscow 125993 



N. M. Savushkina
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



N. G. Kashevarova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



E. A. Strebkova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



D. M. Kudinsky
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



O. G. Alekseeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



K. V. Kolesnikova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

4A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522 



References

1. Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a review. JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):568-578. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22171.

2. Sarzi-Puttini P, Cimmino MA, Scarpa R, et al. Osteoarthritis: an overview of the disease and its treatment strategies. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Aug;35(1 Suppl 1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.01.013.

3. Pelletier JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Raynauld JP. Most recent developments in strategies to reduce the progression of structural changes in osteoarthritis: today and tomorrow. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(2):206. doi: 10.1186/ar1932.

4. Caneiro JP, O'Sullivan PB, Roos EM, et al. Three steps to changing the narrative about knee osteoarthritis care: a call to action. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(5):256-258. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101328.

5. Im GI. The concept of early osteoarthritis and its significance in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2022 Jun;19(3): 431-436. doi: 10.1007/s13770-022-00436-6.

6. Roemer FW, Demehri S, Omoumi P, et al. State of the Art: Imaging of Osteoarthritis-Revisited 2020. Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):5-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192498.

7. Braun HJ, Gold GE. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis: imaging. Bone. 2012 Aug;51(2): 278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.019.

8. Bedson J, Croft PR. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.. 2008 Sep 2:9:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-116.

9. Piccolo CL, Mallio CA, Vaccarino F, et al. Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: a review of multimodal diagnostic approach. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(11):7582–7595. doi:10.21037/qims-22-1392

10. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Mar;12(3): 177-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.11.003.

11. Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH, et al. Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint as sessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Aug;19(8):990-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.05.004.

12. Hunter DJ, Lo GH, Gale D, et al. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb;67(2):206-11. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.066183.

13. Jaremko JL, Jeffery D, Buller M, et al. Preliminary validation of the Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS) for grading bone marrow lesions in osteoarthritis of the knee: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. RMD Open. 2017 Jan 18;3(1):e000355. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000355.

14. Roemer FW, Frobell R, Lohmander LS, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS): longitudinal MRIbased whole joint assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 May;22(5):668-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.006.

15. Roemer FW, Jarraya M, Hayashi D, et al. A perspective on the evolution of semi-quantitative MRI assessment of osteoarthritis: past, present and future. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2024 Apr;32(4):460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.01.001.

16. Felson DT, Lynch J, Guermazi A, et al. Comparison of BLOKS and WORMS scoring systems. Part II: longitudinal assessment of knee MRIs for osteoarthritis and suggested approach based on their performance: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Nov;18(11):1402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.06.016.

17. Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY, et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):811-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050253.

18. Kumm J, Turkiewicz A, Zhang F, et al. Structural abnormalities detected by knee magnetic resonance imaging are common in middle-aged subjects with and without risk factors for osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):535-540. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1495164.

19. Tarhan S, Unlu Z, Goktan C. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonographic evaluation of the patients with knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study. Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Sep; 22(3):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-002-0694-x.

20. Liu K, Li X, Weng Q, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for assessment of synovial abnormalities among patients with knee pain: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;76(2):295-303. doi: 10.1002/acr.25205.

21. Koski JM, Kamel A, Waris P, et al. Atlasbased knee osteophyte assessment with ultrasonography and radiography: relationship to arthroscopic degeneration of articular cartilage. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016;45(2):158-64. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1055797.

22. Roemer FW, Engelke K, Li L, et al. MRI underestimates presence and size of knee osteophytes using CT as a reference standard. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 May;31(5): 656-668. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.01.575.


Review

For citations:


Khalmetova AR, Lila AM, Taskina EA, Alekseeva LI, Savushkina NM, Kashevarova NG, Strebkova EA, Kudinsky DM, Alekseeva OG, Kolesnikova KV. Early-stage knee osteoarthritis: assessment of structural changes using imaging methods. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2025;19(5):34-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2025-5-34-40

Views: 168


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1996-7012 (Print)
ISSN 2310-158X (Online)