The prediction and long-term maintenance of low disease activity during therapy with disease modifying anti-inflammatory drugs for rheumatoid arthritis
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-2-66-70
Abstract
Therapy with biological agents (biologics) over the past few years has become an important part of the strategy of medical treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond insufficiently to the disease modifying anti-inflammatory drugs. The possibility to predict response to biologics is of special importance. Factors associated with good response to TNF-inhibitors are very different: age, liver and kidney function, body mass index, concomitant therapy, immunogenicity, the presence of ACPA and the rheumatoid factor, the cytokine profile, genetics, smoking, previous therapy by biologics etc. Another factor that significantly affects the long-term prognosis of biologic therapy is the primary response to treatment. Inhibitors of TNF-α as a whole is characterized by the development of the most marked clinical response within the first 12–24 weeks of treatment that can sustain for 12 months or more. Certolizumab pegol is characterized by rapid development of marked clinical response to treatment against disease activity and function with maintaining consistent improvement over the years, and the prognosis can be determined in most patients by the response to therapy in the first 12 weeks. We present a clinical case.
About the Author
E.L. LuchikhinaRussian Federation
References
1. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(3):492-509. DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
2. Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, Nam JL, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(3):529-35. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204575. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3. Moreland LW1, O'Dell JR, Paulus HE, et al. A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(9):2824-35. DOI: 10.1002/art.34498.
4. O'Dell JR, Curtis JR, Mikuls TR, et al. Validation of the methotrexate-first strategy in patients with early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis: results from a two-year randomized, double-blind trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(8):1985-94. DOI: 10.1002/art.38012.
5. Van Vollenhoven RF, Ernestam S, Geborek P, et al. Addition of infliximab compared with addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (Swefot trial): 1-year results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9688):459-66. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60944-2.
6. Van Vollenhoven RF1, Geborek P, Forslind K, et al. Conventional combination treatment versus biological treatment in methotrexaterefractory early rheumatoid arthritis: 2 year follow-up of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group Swefot trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1712-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60027-0.
7. Daien CI, Morel J. Predictive factors of response to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: towards personalized medicine. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:386148. DOI: 10.1155/2014/386148. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
8. Александрова ЕН, Новиков АА, Насонов ЕЛ. Роль лабораторных биомаркеров в мониторинге и прогнозировании эффективности терапии ревматических заболеваний генно-инженерными биологическими препаратами. Современная ревматология. 2014;(1):5–13. [Aleksandrova EN, Novikov AA, Nasonov EL. Role of laboratory biomarkers in monitoring and prediction of the effectiveness of treatment of rheumatic diseases using genetically engineered drugs. Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology. 2014;(1):5-13. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-1-5-13.
9. LvQ,YinY,LiX,etal.Thestatusof rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody are not associated with the effect of anti-TNFα agent treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89442. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089442.
10. Shergy WJ, Isern RA, Cooley DA, et al. Open label study to assess infliximab safety and timing of onset of clinical benefit among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(4):667-77.
11. Каратеев ДЕ, Насонов ЕЛ, Лучихина ЕЛ и др. Эффективность и безопасность лечения адалимумабом больных активным ревматоидным артритом с резистентностью к стандартной терапии: результаты Российского национального исследования. Терапевтический архив. 2012;84(8):22–8. [Karateev DE, Nasonov EL, Luchikhina EL, et al. Efficiency and safety of treatment adalimumaby patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with resistance to standard therapy: results of the Russian national research. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2012;84(8):22–8. (In Russ.)]
12. Smolen J, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(4):631-7. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.123919. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
13. White D, Pahau H, Duggan E, et al. Trajectory of intensive treat-to-target disease modifying drug regimen in an observational study of an early rheumatoid arthritis cohort. BMJ Open. 2013;3(7):pii: e003083. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003083.
14. Curtis JR, McVie T, Mikuls TR, et al. Clinical response within 12 weeks as a predictor of future low disease activity in patients with early RA: results from the TEAR Trial. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(5):572-8. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120715.
15. Strand V, Mease P, Burmester GR, et al. Rapid and sustained improvements in health-related quality of life, fatigue, and other patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate over 1 year: results from the RAPID 1 randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R170. DOI: 10.1186/ar2859. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
16. Smolen J, Landewe RB, Mease P, et al. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: the RAPID 2 study. A randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):797-804. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.101659.
17. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
18. Fleischmann R, Vencovsky J, van Vollenhoven RF, et al. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol monotherapy every
19. weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis failing previous disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy: the FAST4WARD study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):805-11. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.099291.
20. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
21. Curtis JR, Luijtens K, Kavanaugh A. Predicting future response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis patients: features at 12 weeks associated with low disease activity at 1 year. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(5):658-67. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21600.
22. Keystone E, Landewe R, van Vollenhoven R, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 5-year results from the RAPID 1 trial and open-label extension. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug 5. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203695.
23. Каратеев ДЕ, Лучихина ЕЛ, Муравьев ЮВ и др. Первое российское стратегическое исследование фармакотерапии ревматоидного артрита (РЕМАРКА). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2013;51(2):117–25. [Karateev DE, Luchikhina EL, Muravyev Yu , et al. The first Russian strategic study of pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (REMARCA). Nauchno-practicheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2013;51(2):117-25. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2013-637.
24. Available from: http://rheumatolog.ru/experts/klinicheskie-rekomendacii
Review
For citations:
Luchikhina E. The prediction and long-term maintenance of low disease activity during therapy with disease modifying anti-inflammatory drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2014;8(2):66-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-2-66-70