Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: recommendations and practice
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-2-15-20
Abstract
The results of studies conducted over the past two decades were used to elaborate EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); the updated recommendations have recently been published.
In accordance with these recommendations, the tactics in management of each patient is determined by the disease activity. This indicator determines the frequency of examination for the patient, selection of an anti-rheumatic drug, and the need for therapy correction. Methotrexate is recommended to patients with active RA (high or moderate activity) naÏve to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Another DMARD can be used for patients with lower activity of RA. Therapy effectiveness is evaluated as soon as 3 months after its prescription.
Clinical improvement (decrease in RA activity from high to moderate) needs to be achieved by this time. However, the aim of therapy is to achieve low disease activity or remission (that needs to be achieved earlier than 6 month after the therapy was started) rather than clinical improvement only. If the maximum dose of a drug results neither in clinical improvement after 3 months nor in low activity after 6 months, the therapy should be corrected. EULAR experts recommend using the overall score that includes joint score indices (DAS28, SDAI or CDAI) to assess the level of RA activity.
About the Author
Yu.A. Olyunin
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar 1;73(3):492–509. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573.
2. Heiberg T, Finset A, Uhlig T, Kvien TK. Seven year changes in health status and priorities for improvement of health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64(2):191–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.022699.
3. Groarke A, Curtis R, Coughlan R, Gsel A. The role of perceived and actual disease status in adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(9):1142–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh262. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
4. Eichler HG, Mavros P, Geling O, et al. Association between health-related quality of life and clinical efficacy endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis patients after four weeks treatment with anti-inflammatory agents. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;43(5):209–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/CPP43209.
5. Book C, Saxne T, Jacobsson LT. Prediction of mortality in rheumatoid arthritis based on disease activity markers. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(3):430–4.
6. Dessein PH, Joffe BI, Stanwix AE. High sensitivity C-reactive protein as a disease activity marker in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(6):1095–7.
7. Smolen JS, Van Der Heijde DM, et al.; Active-Controlled Study of Patients Receiving Infliximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of Early Onset (ASPIRE) Study Group. Predictors of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with high-dose methotrexate with or without concomitant infliximab: results from the ASPIRE trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Mar;54(3):702–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21678.
8. Gossec L, Dougados M, Goupille P, et al. Prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(6):675–80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.010611.
9. Wolfe F. Comparative usefulness of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(8):1477–85.
10. Ward MM. Relative sensitivity to change of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum C-reactive protein concentration in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(5):884–95.
11. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780360601.
12. Van der Heijde DM, van't Hof MA, van Riel PL, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990 Nov;49(11):916–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.49.11.916.
13. Van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, et al. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(1):34–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780390105.
14. Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, Kuper HH, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380107.
15. Van Gestel AM, Haagsma CJ, van Riel PL. Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(10):1845–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199810)41:10%3C1845::AID-
16. ART17%3E3.0.CO;2-K.
17. Prevoo ML, van Gestel AM, van T Hof MA, et al. Remission in a prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. American Rheumatism Association preliminary remission criteria in relation to the disease activity score. Br J Rheumatol. 1996;35(11):1101–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/35.11.1101.
18. Fransen J, Creemers MC, Van Riel PL. Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: agreement of the disease activity score (DAS28) with the ARA preliminary remission criteria. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(10):1252–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh297. Epub 2004 Jul 6.
19. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, et al. A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(2):244–57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ rheumatology/keg072.
20. Leeb BF, Andel I, Sautner J, et al. Disease activity measurement of rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the disease activity score including 28 joints (DAS28) in daily routine. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb 15;53(1):56–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.20923.
21. Чемерис НА, Каратеев ДЕ, Насонов ЕЛ. Новые подходы к оценке активности ревматоидного артрита: упрощенный индекс активности болезни SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) при раннем артрите. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2005;43(2):7–10. [Chemeris NA, Karateev DE, Nassonov EL. New approaches to the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity: Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) in early arthritis. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2005;43(2):7–10. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14412/ 1995-4484-2005-1516.
22. Aletaha D, Ward MM, Machold KP, et al. Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: defining criteria for disease activity states. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2625–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21235.
23. Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(4):R796–806. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1740.
24. Aletaha D, Smolen J. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI):
25. a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep–Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S100–8.
26. Bentley MJ, Reed GW. Simplified composite disease activity measures in rheumatoid arthritis: should they be used in standard care? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 Mar–Apr;26(2):358–66.
27. Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, et al.; American College of Rheumatology; European League Against Rheumatism. American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):573–86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.30129.
28. Shaver TS, Anderson JD, Weidensaul DN, et al. The problem of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and remission in clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2008 Jun;35(6):1015–22.
29. Mierau M, Schoels M, Gonda G, et al. Assessing remission in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Jun;46(6):975–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ rheumatology/kem007.
30. Iking-Konert C, Aringer M, Wollenhaupt J, et al. Performance of the new 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria with tocilizumab using the phase IIIb study TAMARA as an example and their comparison with traditional remission criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Nov;70(11):1986–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2011.152678.
31. Каратеев ДЕ, Олюнин ЮА. О классификации ревматоидного артрита. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2008;46(1):5–16. [Karateev DE, Olunin YA. About classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya =Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2008;46(1):5–16. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2008-848.
Review
For citations:
Olyunin Y. Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: recommendations and practice. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2014;8(2):15-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-2-15-20
Views:
3335
Email this article 