Sociomedical sequels and quality of life in patients of old age group with proximal femoral fractures
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-3-51-55
Abstract
The sociomedical significance of osteoporosis is determined by its sequels (vertebral and peripheral skeletal fractures) that are responsible for high mortality and disability rates among persons in the old age group and accordingly for high material costs in the health care system.
Objective: to study sociomedical sequels and quality of life in patients with proximal femoral fractures in the old age group.
Subjects and methods. 956 patients with osteoporotic fractures were followed up. Major social sequels were traced in the patients 6, 12, and 24 months after femur fractures in relation to treatment options.
Results. There were 10 (8.0%) and 78 (66.7%) bedridden patients in the surgical and medical treatment groups, respectively. Twenty four months after fracture, recovery of function was noted in 72 (57.6%) and 32 (27.35%) patients receiving surgical and medical treatment, respectively.
Conclusion. The findings suggest that immediate and late sequels in patients with proximal femoral fractures depend on a treatment option.
About the Authors
T. A. Raskina
Kemerovo State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Kemerovo, Russia 4–16, Molodezhnyi Pr., Kemerovo 650090
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. V. Averkieva
Kemerovo State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Kemerovo, Russia 4–16, Molodezhnyi Pr., Kemerovo 650090
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Меньшикова ЛВ, Храмцова НА, Ершова ОБ и др. Ближайшие и отдаленные исходы переломов проксимального отдела бедра у лиц пожилого возраста и их медико-социальные последствия (по данным многоцентрового исследования). Остеопороз и остеопатии. 2002;(1):8–11. [Men'shikova LV, Khramtsova NA, Ershova OB, et al. The closest and remote outcomes of changes of proximal department
2. of a hip at persons of advanced age and their medico-social consequences (according to multicenter research). Osteoporoz i osteopatii. 2002;(1):8–11. (In Russ.)]
3. Родионова СС, Колондаев АФ, Солод ЭИ. Комбинированное лечение переломов шейки бедренной кости на фоне остеопороза. Русский медицинский журнал. 2004;12(24):1388–91. [Rodionova SS, Kolondaev AF, Solod EI. The combined treatment of fractures of a neck of a femur against osteoporosis. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2004;12(24):1388–91. (In Russ.)]
4. Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG, Saeian K. Fracture-associated hospitalizations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(1): 176–82. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1433-9. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
5. Лесняк ОМ, Беневоленская ЛИ. Остеопороз в Российской Федерации: проблемы и перспективы. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2010;(5):14–8. [Lesnyak OM, Benevolenskaya LI. Osteoporosis in the Russian Federation: Problems and Perspectives. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2010;(5):14–8. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484- 2010-725.
6. Гладкова ЕН, Ходырев ВН, Лесняк ОМ. Исходы переломов проксимального отдела бедра у лиц старше 50 лет. Остеопороз и остеопатии. В кн.: Тезисы IV Российского конгресса по остеопорозу. Санкт-Петербург; 2010;Приложение 1:32. [Gladkova EN, Khodyrev VN, Lesnyak OM. Outcomes of changes of proximal department of a hip at persons are more senior than 50 years. Osteoporosis and osteopathy. In: Tezisy IV Rossiiskogo kongressa po osteoporozu [Theses of the IV Russian congress on osteoporosis]. St-Petersburg; 2010;Suppl 1:32.]
7. Аникин СГ. Распространенность, факторы риска и социальная значимость остеопоротических переломов бедра и предплечья среди населения г. Электросталь. Автореф. дисс. ... канд. мед. наук. Москва; 2002. 22 с. [Anikin SG. Rasprostranennost', faktory riska i sotsial'naya znachimost' osteoporoticheskikh perelomov bedra i predplech'ya sredi naseleniya g. Elektrostal'. Avtoref. diss. ...kand. med. Nauk [Prevalence, risk factors and the social importance the osteoporoticheskikh of fractures of a hip and a forearm among the population Electrostal: Cand. Diss. (Med. Sci.)]. Moscow; 2002. 22 p.]
8. Меньшикова ЛВ. Исходы переломов бедренной кости и их медико-социальные последствия. Клиническая медицина. 2002;80(6):39–41. [Men'shikova LV. Outcomes of fractures of a femur and their medico-social consequences. Klinicheskaya meditsina. 2002;80(6):39–41. (In Russ.)]
9. Аскаров АФ, Еникеев РИ, Сивков СВ и др. Проблемы остеопороза и оказание травматологической помощи у людей пожилого возраста. Здравоохранение Башкортостана. 2003;Спецвыпуск 6:6–9. [Askarov AF, Enikeev RI, Sivkov SV, et al. Problems of osteoporosis and rendering the traumatologic help at people of advanced age. Zdravookhranenie Bashkortostana. 2003;Spessial Issue 6:6–9. (In Russ.)]
10. Лесняк ОМ, Беневоленская ЛИ. Клинические рекомендации. Остеопороз. Диагностика, профилактика и лечение. 2-е изд. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2010. 272 с. [Lesnyak OM, Benevolenskaya LI. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Osteoporoz. Diagnostika, profilaktika i lechenie [Clinical recommendations. Osteoporosis. Diagnostics, prevention and treatment]. 2st ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. 272 p.]
11. Parikh S, Brookhart MA, Stedman M. Correlations of nursing home characteristics with prescription of osteoporosis medications. Bone. 2011;48(5):1164–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.02.006.
12. Farahmand BY, Persson PG, Michaelsson K, et al. Physical activity and hip fracture: a population-based case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(2):308–14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.2.308.
13. Novack V, Jotkowitz A, Etzion O, et al. Does delay in surgery after hip fracture lead to worse outcomes. A multicenter survey. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(3):170–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm003.
14. Koot VC, Peeters PH, de Jong JR, et al. Functional results after treatment of hip fracture: a multicentre, prospective study in 215 patients. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(6):480–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/110241500750008808.
15. Roder F, Schwab M, Aleker T, et al. Proximal femur fracture in older patients rehabilitation and clinical outcomes. Age Ageing. 2003;32(l):8–9.
16. Бахтиярова СА. Проспективное исследование качества жизни и социально-экономических последствий осложненного остеопороза. Автореф. дисс. … канд. мед. наук. Москва; 2009. 22 с. [Bakhtiyarova SA. Prospektivnoe issledovanie kachestva zhizni i sotsial'no-konomicheskikh posledstvii oslozhnennogo osteoporoza. Avtoref. diss. … kand. med. nauk [Prospektivny research of quality of life and social and economic consequences of the complicated osteoporosis: Cand. Diss. (Med. Sci.)]. Moscow; 2009. 22 p.]
17. Vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporosis Int. 2005;16(5):568–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1735-x. Epub 2004 Oct 27.
18. Беневоленская ЛИ, Лесняк ОМ. Остеопороз. Диагностика, профилактика и лечение: клинические рекомендации. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медия; 2005. 176 с. [Benevolenskaya LI, Lesnyak OM. Osteoporoz. Diagnostika, profilaktika i lechenie: klinicheskie rekomendatsii [Osteoporosis. Diagnostics, prevention and treatment: clinical recommendations]. Moscow: GEOTARMediya; 2005. 176 р.]
19. Лесняк ОМ. Фармакоэкономика средств профилактики и лечения остеопороза. Руководство по остеопорозу. Москва: Бином; 2003. С. 469–81. [Lesnyak OM. Farmakoekonomika sredstv profilaktiki i lecheniya osteoporoza. Rukovodstvo po osteoporozu [Farmakoekonomika of prophylactics and osteoporosis treatment. Guide to osteoporosis]. Moscow: Binom; 2003. P. 469–81.]
20. Еникеева ЮШ, Исаканова АО, Лесняк ОМ. Виды медицинской помощи, оказываемой пациентам с переломами проксимального отдела бедра. Остеопороз и остеопатии. В кн: Тезисы IV Российского конгресса по остеопорозу. Санкт-Петербург; 2010;Приложение 1;28. [Enikeeva YuSh, Isakanova AO, Lesnyak OM. Types of the medical help given patients with changes of proximal department of a hip. Osteoporosis and osteopathy. In: Tezisy IV Rossiiskogo kongressa po osteoporozu [Theses of the IV Russian congress on osteoporosis]. St-Petersburg; 2010;Suppl 1;28.
21. Оценка медико-социальных последствий переломов проксимального отдела бедра. В кн.: От научных достижений до внедрения в практику: Материалы съезда кардиологов и терапевтов центра России. Москва – Рязань; 2008. С. 37–40. [Assessment of medico-social consequences of changes of proximal department of a hip. In: Ot nauchnykh dostizhenii do vnedreniya v praktiku: Materialy s’ezda kardiologov i terapevtov tsentra Rossii [From scientific achievements before introduction in practice: Materials of congress of cardiologists and therapists of the center of Russia]. Moscow- Ryazan'; 2008. P. 37–40.]
Review
For citations:
Raskina TA, Averkieva YV. Sociomedical sequels and quality of life in patients of old age group with proximal femoral fractures. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2014;8(3):51-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-3-51-55
Views:
1363
Email this article 