Validation of a Russian-language version of the Foot Functional Index (FFI) questionnaire
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2016-3-47-51
Abstract
The Foot Functional Index (FFI) questionnaire most completely reflects the functional status of patients with joint diseases of the feet.
Objective: to study the psychometric properties of a Russian-language version of the FFI questionnaire.
Patients and methods. The reliability, sensitivity, and validity of the Russian-language version of the FFI questionnaire were assessed in 55 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The investigators checked the reliability by assessing the internal consistency (calculating Cronbach's alpha) and reproducibility by a test-retest analysis. The criterion validity was evaluated by correlation analysis using HAQ, RAPID3, and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The sensitivity of FFI was studied by comparing its dynamics with RAPID3 changes during treatment.
Results. Evaluating the internal consistency yielded a high Cronbach's alpha (0.78). The test-retest analysis demonstrated a significant correlation (0.83) between the results of primary and secondary testing. Assessing the criterion validity showed a high or near-high relationship to the scores of RAPID3 (0.78), HAQ (0.69), and pain VAS (0.76). The group of patients who were observed to have a decrease in disease activity according to RAPID3 from a high (16.2±4.1) to moderate (10.5±5.2) degree displayed a more marked reduction in FFI (ΔFFI = 20.5±2.3) than the group that did not exhibit significant changes in disease activity (ΔFFI = 6.9±3.4).
Conclusion. FFI is a reliable, valid, and sensitive tool to evaluate the functional status of patients with foot diseases in RA.
About the Authors
E. V. OrlovaRussian Federation
A. V. Surnov
Russian Federation
D. E. Karateev
Russian Federation
V. N. Amirdzhanova
Russian Federation
References
1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Apr;69(4):631-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.123919. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
2. Каратеев ДЕ, Лучихина ЕЛ. Современная стратегия терапии ревматоидного артрита. Русский медицинский журнал. 2012;(30):1504-9. [Karateev DE, Luchikhina EL. Modern strategy of therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2012;(30):1504-9. (In Russ.)].
3. Орлова ЕВ, Каратеев ДЕ, Булгакова НА. Лечение ревматоидного артрита до достижения цели (Treat to Target): российская версия международных рекомендаций для пациентов. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2013;51(3):246-4. [Orlova EV, Karateev DE, Bulgakova NA. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: Russian version of international guidelines for patients. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2013;51(3):246-4. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484- 2013-1496.
4. Van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP, Ursum J, et al. Prevalence and course of forefoot impairments and walking disability in the first eight years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov 15;59(11): 1596-602. doi: 10.1002/art.24188.
5. Goksel Karatepe A, Gunaydin R, Adibelli ZH, et al. Foot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the relationship with foot functions. Int J Rheum Dis. 2010;13(2):158- 63.
6. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(6):561-70.
7. Van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP, Terwee CB, et al. A systematic review of instruments measuring foot function, foot pain, and foot-related disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(9):1257-69.
8. Новик АА, Ионова ТИ. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине. Москва: ЮЛМА Медиа Групп; 2007. 320 с. [Novik AA, Ionova TI. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniyu kachestva zhizni v meditsine [A guide to the study of quality of life in medicine]. Moscow: YuLMA Media Grupp; 2007. 320 p.]
9. Старкова АС, Амирджанова ВН. Валидация русскоязычной версии опросника RAPID- 3. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2011;49(4):36-40. [Starkova AS, Amirdzhanova VN. Validation of the russianlanguage version of the RAPID-3 questionnaire. Nauchno- prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and practice. 2011;49(4):36-40. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2011-59.
10. Амирджанова ВН, Койлубаева ГМ, Горячев ДВ и др. Валидация русскоязычной версии Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2004;42(2):59-64. [Amirdzhanova VN, Koilubaeva GM, Goryachev DV, et al. Validation of the russian-language version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Nauchno- prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2004;42(2):59-64. (In Russ.)].
11. Landorf KB, Radford JA, Hudson S. Minimal important difference: Values for the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale. The Foot. 2008;(18):15-9.
12. Martinelli N, Scotto GM, Sartorelli E, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases. Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0435-4. Epub 2013 May 21.
13. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Huber M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in Germanspeaking patients with foot complaints. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107(2):111-8.
14. Wu SH, Liang HW, Hou WH. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107(2):111.
15. Pourtier-Piotte C, Pereira B, Soubrier M, et al. French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;58(5):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j. rehab.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
Review
For citations:
Orlova EV, Surnov AV, Karateev DE, Amirdzhanova VN. Validation of a Russian-language version of the Foot Functional Index (FFI) questionnaire. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2016;10(3):47-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2016-3-47-51