Immunological features in anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein antibody positive patients with systemic scleroderma
https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-1-49-56
Abstract
In anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein (anti-U1-RNP) antibody positive patients with systemic scleroderma (SSD), the clinical picture and course of the disease have specific features: there is a preponderance of its limited form; inflammatory damage to the joints and muscles comes to the fore; and cutaneous manifestations are mild. Moreover, a high frequency (68%) of interstitial lung disease is found. At the same time, the autoimmune profile in this group has been little studied.
Objective: to investigate the level of major autoantibodies (autoAbs) in anti-U1RNP antibody positive patients with SSD and to compare the frequency of the autoAbs in this group and in the groups of patients with SSD phenotypes associated with anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) and anti-topoisomerase I (anti-Scl70) antibodies.
Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled a total of 144 patients meeting the 2013 ACR/EULAR SSD classification criteria. Forty-four anti-U1RNP antibody positive patients were found to have autoAbs, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACCP), anti-Ro, anti-La, anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), anti-Smith (anti-Sm), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-histidyl tRNA synthetase (anti-Jo1), anti-Scl70, and anti-RNA polymerase III (anti-RNAP-III) antibodies, and ACA in two points. The study group (anti-U1RNP antibody positive patients with SSD) and the comparison groups (anti-Scl70 and ACA positive patients) were comparatively analyzed.
Results and discussion. Anti-U1RNP antibody positive patients with SSD were commonly observed to have overlaps (34%) with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as concurrence with Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) (32.5%). The study group was found to have frequently RF (27%), anti-Ro (41%), anti-dsDNA (50%) antibodies, rarely anti-Sm (9%), ACCP (9%), anti-La (7%), ACA (11%), anti-Scl70 (9%), and aCL (2%) antibodies. Anti-Jo1 and anti-RNAP-III antibodies were not detected in any patient. SSD patients who were highly positive for anti-U1RNP antibodies (more than 2 upper limits of the reference range) significantly more frequently exhibited RF, anti-Ro and anti-dsDNA antibodies (p<0.01). Over time, anti-U1RNP antibodies detected at the onset of the disease persisted in 75% of patients. autoAbs were observed to disappear in patients with a low baseline titer of anti-U1RNP antibodies. Re-examination demonstrated that the detection rate of other autoAbs remained high in the group of patients who were highly positive for anti-U1RNP antibodies. Comparison of the three groups showed that the specific feature of the study group was the more frequent presence of other autoAbs, among which anti-Ro antibodies were most important. Their presence was associated with SS.
Conclusion. In addition to clinical features, patients with SSD and anti-U1RNP antibody overproduction differ from those with major SSD phenotypes by the more frequent presence of other autoAbs. Persons who are highly positive for anti-U1RNP show the steady-state elevated levels of RF, anti-Ro and anti-dsDNA antibodies and the rare detection of SSD-specific autoAbs (ACA, anti-Scl70 and anti-RNAP-III).
About the Authors
R. U. ShayakhmetovaRussian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
L. P. Ananyeva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
O. A. Koneva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
M. N Starovoitova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
O. V. Desinova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
O. B. Ovsyannikova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
L. A. Garzanova
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
References
1. Guseva NG. Sistemnaya sklerodermiya i psevdosklerodermicheskie sindromy [Systemic scleroderma and pseudoscleroderma syndromes]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1993 (In Russ.).
2. Aleksandrova EN, Novikov AA, Nasonov EL. Current approaches to the laboratory diagnosis of rheumatic diseases: Role of molecular and cellular biomarkers. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(3):324-38. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016-324-338 (In Russ.).
3. Ananyeva LP. The role of autoantibodies in the early diagnosis of systemic immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(1):5-10. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2019-1-5-10 (In Russ.).
4. Ananyeva LP, Aleksandrova EN. Autoantibodies in scleroderma systematica: Spectrum, clinical associations, and prognostic value. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016; 54(1):86-99. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016- 86-99 (In Russ.).
5. Hamaguchi Y, Kodera M, Matsushita T, et al. Clinical and immunological predictors of scleroderma renal crisis for Japanese systemic sclerosis patients with anti-RNA polymerase III autoantibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67:1045-52. doi: 10.1002/art.38994
6. Kattah NH, Kattah MG, Utz PJ. The U1-snRNP complex: structural properties relating to autoimmune pathogenesis in rheumatic diseases. Immunol Rev. 2010 Jan; 233(1):126-45. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00863.x
7. Desbois AC, Cacoub P. Systemicsclerosis: Anupdatein 2016. Autoimmun Rev. 2016 May; 15(5):417-26. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.01.007
8. Nimelstein SH, Brody S, McShane D, Holman HR. Mixed connective tissue disease: a subsequent evaluation of the original 25 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1980;59: 239-48. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198007000-00001
9. Stamenkovic B, Stankovic A, Dimic A, et al. The clinical significance of antibody determination to cyclic citrullinated peptides in systemic sclerosis. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2012 May-Jun;140(5-6):350-4. doi: 10.2298/SARH1206350S
10. Varga J, Wigley FM. Scleroderma – Systemic Sclerosis. In: Clinical Immunology. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2019. P. 747.
11. Ananyeva LP. Early systemic scleroderma: a current diagnostic algorithm (a lecture). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2012; 50(2):87-93. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2012- 1279 (In Russ.).
12. StClair EW, Query CC, Bentley R, et al. Expression of autoantibodies to recombinant (U1) RNP-associated 70K antigen in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1990;54:266-80. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(90)90088-8
13. Horimoto AMC, Possamai VM, Costa IP. Sjö gren’s Syndrome and Sicca Symptoms in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis. J Arthritis. 2016;5:1.
14. Shayakhmetova RU, Ananyeva LP, Koneva OA, et al. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with systemic sclerosis positive for anti-ribonucleoprotein antibodies. NauchnoPrakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(5):539-44. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484- 2019-539-544 (In Russ.).
15. Cappelli S, Bellando Randone S, Martinovic D, et al. «To Be or Not To Be», Ten Years After: Evidence for Mixed Connective Tissue Disease as a Distinct Entity. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;41(4): 589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.010
16. Steen V, Domsic RT, Lucas M, et al. A clinical and serologic comparison of African American and Caucasian patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Sep;64(9):2986-94. doi: 10.1002/art.34482
17. Ihn H, Yamane K, Yazawa N, et al. Distribution and antigen specificity of antiU1RNP antibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;117:383-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.00961.x
18. Desinova OV, Starovoytova MN, Guseva IA, et al. Features of systemic sclerosis-rheumatoid arthritis overlap syndrome (SS-RA overlap syndrome). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2007;45(4):18-23. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2007-18-23 (In Russ.).
19. Starovoitova MN, Desinova OV, Koneva OA, et al. Profile of autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(4):418-23. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016-418-423 (In Russ.).
20. Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11): 2737-47.
21. Bellando-Randone S, Matucci-Cerinic M. From Raynaud`s phenomenon to very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis / The VEDOSS approach. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2013;9(4):245-8. doi: 10.2174/157339710 904140417124819
22. Hamaguchi Y, Takehara K. Anti-nuclear autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis?: News and perspectives. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018;3(3):201-13. doi: 10.1177/239719831 8783930
23. Ambrose N, Morgan TA, Galloway J, et al. Differences in disease phenotype and severity in SLE across age groups on behalf of the UK JSLE Study Group. Lupus. 2016;25:1542-50. doi: 10.1177/0961203316644333
24. Gunnarsson R, Hetlevik SO, Lilleby V, et al. Mixed connective tissue disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30:95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.03.002
25. Koenig M, Fritzler MJ, Targoff IN, et al. Heterogeneity of autoantibodies in 100 patients with autoimmune myositis: insights into clinical features and outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:78. doi: 10.1186/ar2276
Review
For citations:
Shayakhmetova RU, Ananyeva LP, Koneva OA, Starovoitova MN, Desinova OV, Ovsyannikova OB, Garzanova LA. Immunological features in anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein antibody positive patients with systemic scleroderma. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2020;14(1):49-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2020-1-49-56